Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

The reading and the lecture is about the reduction of five day work week to four day work week for reduced wage of four- fifth of normal wage. The article states that reducing the workday would benefit both the employee and workers and provide three reasons for the support. However, the professor explains that four days work week would instead doesn't benefit both company and workers and refutes each of the author's reasons.

First, the reading claims that due to less work week, workers would replenish their energy thereby resting and fewer errors are likely to occur. So, hiring additional workers would not impact the overall payroll cost to the company. But, the professor refutes this point by saying that additional hiring of workers at lower wage rate would not benefit the comp[any.He states that hiring more workers in this four day work day increase the much more training, health benefits and equipment to the workers.

Second, the article points that more employment would be raise as-workload would be shifted to others. However, the professor says that it would not create employment. In saying so, the professor states that company may expect the same work load from four days week workers for the work of five days.This will therefore, does not create jobs.

Third, the reading says that workers who could afford a lower salary would have extra time to spend with the family to spend the quality of their lives. The professor opposes this point by explaining that during the economic shut down, the workers working in four day schedule might loose their jobs. Moreover, the workers on the department like management are less likely to compete their position to higher level with the workers working on the five day week schedule.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...is about the reduction of five day work week to four day work week for reduced wage ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
... of five day work week to four day work week for reduced wage of four- fifth of norm...
^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... that four days work week would instead doesnt benefit both company and workers and re...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...wer wage rate would not benefit the comp[any.He states that hiring more workers i...
^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...age rate would not benefit the comp[any.He states that hiring more workers in this...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... week workers for the work of five days.This will therefore, does not create jobs. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...kers working in four day schedule might loose their jobs. Moreover, the workers on th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16196451274 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491467576792 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4629490966 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.083333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585907495133 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284857860223 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370114005492 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043533555801 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145987877477 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.