At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Many countries are going through phases where balance between young and old residents are out of balance. If country population is ageing, I firmly believe that this is a starting point of a big problem. Therefore if countries have more younger people than older I am certain that it will outweigh disadvantages.
Firstly, well functional society needs young and healthy individuals to fill different areas of economy. For example different positions in farming industry. At the time when I wast in the best years of my life, I did candidate for forklift driving position in farming industry. First thing what they asked was my age. Why is age so important? Because staff members had to work long shift hours and same time remain razor sharp until to next shift. Persons who were over 40 years old could’t fit for night shifts because of different hazards which will come with ageing, like longer reaction time.
Secondly, country with young population have less problems with finances. If most of people in country are retired then who will make money for them to pay out pensions. A good illustration of this is current situation in Japan. Over half of a population is suitable for the retirement. Nevertheless most of them are still working. Moreover, Japan with the high level of pensionary workers is among highest in the world. Country won’t have enough money to pay out pensions for old people. There is not enough younger workers who would pay taxes and support retired citizens.
Taking everything into consideration, it is clearly understood that countries with larger number of young people are more beneficial to economy. Every healthy and functional society needs young and sharp minds to fill different working positions. Without young generation many countries are struggling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s is a starting point of a big problem. Therefore if countries have more younger people t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'younger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: younger
...ig problem. Therefore if countries have more younger people than older I am certain that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...dly, country with young population have less problems with finances. If most of peop...
^^^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...on have less problems with finances. If most of people in country are retired then who will ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ulation is suitable for the retirement. Nevertheless most of them are still working. Moreove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18027210884 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66422081712 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.96510902 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5238095238 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199887167787 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534477415501 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491425342161 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120306018166 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370212729396 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.