Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that every thing is noticeably changing from the past, even our behaviors. There is an assumption that people were appreciating teachers before more than today. For me, I agree with that claim and in this essay I will discuss my reasons for that support.
To begin with, people were generally more polite and gentle few decades ago than today. They had several morals that forced them to respect each other including teachers. What created the difference between the past and the presence is that morals were a lifestyle instead of nurtured characters. They learned them at school, from their parents or at the religious centers. One example that can shed the light on this idea is that people in the past respected older persons and were compassionate to the youngsters and weak persons. They were putting the teachers in the position of prophets as they also transfer a message to the next generations. Now, people's behaviors changed due to the moral decline because of the media. They are no longer respecting the teachers and this can appear in the way the students treat their teachers. They can even shout at them or make fun of them.
Secondly, people always appreciate the scarce things. In the past, teachers' number was small and the teaching job was reserved for smart and highly educated persons. Today, there are a lot of teachers in different fields and as they increase in number, their importance decreases as well. For instance, when I was at primary school, there was only one teacher for the science who was giving courses to several classes. Today, the number of the teachers for a single subject is doubled or tripled.This factor may participate in reducing the value of teaching.
In the summary, it is obvious that teachers were valued in the past more than today because of the increasing number of teachers as well as the change in the people's good standards.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer44
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...nged due to the moral decline because of the media. They are no longer respecting...
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
... a single subject is doubled or tripled.This factor may participate in reducing the ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, no doubt, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86196319018 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48741232378 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5297914336 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234079747848 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746532380916 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558610638019 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161056567168 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048452353709 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.