Regarding the fact that human being are living beyond the cominucational environment which encourage them to develope their idea through sharing with each other. In other words, comiunication is knoen as principle behavior in human to catch and stranch their propous by each other. In this regard, some people blieve that coworker can cominicate in person to develop their project. However, others believe that the electronical devises would be a better option in this case. As far as I am concern face to face comiunicating is efficent. I feel this way for two reasones which I will explore in the following essay.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that, having person conection will give you a chance to have more interaction about the problems and the solution and convey your opinion clearly over the time of handling the project. Conversly by emeil comiunicating you can not give the reflection of the idea that proposes. In fact there is no interaction to help guides to assesst their problem during their proccess,Which is kind of time wasting.Take my personal experience as a compelling example. I was working as a leader of project in one of the courses in university and I was supous to handle the problems with other members of team. The problem was that one of my teamworker were able that time to gather in the time project making and I had to manage the problem with email. What was signifacantly surprises me was that I didant get any clear idea from others, which makes me confused. More over takes me too long time to wait for the answer from them.
Second important reason about this issues is that, an intricate presentation would not be apear by writing in the email, In fact, discusing about the details in project need to have a face to face comiunication rather than by email. There was a research around this fact on one groups of students that clearly reperesents the drastic disadvatage about this manner. The resuls shows that almost all research team who had successful and mature conclusion at the end of their project were had been work near each other. In other words, they work as coworker face to face not by far reaching devives like e- mail.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that classmate better to visite each other during the proccess of executing their project. It does not only help them do make a beneficial interactive discision, but also gave them a chance to gain more detail about their projects which by e-mail is complitly imposible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... would be a better option in this case. As far as I am concern face to face comiun...
^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Which
...esst their problem during their proccess,Which is kind of time wasting.Take my persona...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
... proccess,Which is kind of time wasting.Take my personal experience as a compelling ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 31, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...om them. Second important reason about this issues is that, an intricate presentati...
^^^^
Line 6, column 243, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ication rather than by email. There was a research around this fact on one groups of stude...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80930232558 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65565103561 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6343994512 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.842105263 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198575394829 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600427566251 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487492549046 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127291239426 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365160039948 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.