Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are the nation builder because they shape our rising generation, guiding them towards the path of success as well as protect them from being violated. The importance of teacher is indelible in our world. The value of teachers are now dwindling than in the past is the given statement-with this someone would agree, others are might not have been the agreement. In my opinion, the value and acknowledgement for the teacher was high in past for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that in past teachers were respected because on that time people fear teacher. The frightened to the teachers was conspicuous as they engaged our learning process, it can be said we were prejudiced to follow our teachers path. For example, I studied in a village 15 years ago from now. On that time we had no internet availability and our parents were more conserved to teach us regarding the respect to our teacher. So, whenever, we went to school we showed them respect by saying 'Assalamualikum' from a considerable distance before approaching our teacher face to face. But, nowadays the scenarios is fully flipped. Todays student does not show respect to their teacher what actually teachers are deserving to get. Such respect reveals the student morality as well as family education. As you can see that, respect for teacher were widespread in past because our family taught them to respect them.
Another reason is that when we analyze our historical data we found there are several documents regarding the respect for teacher. On these documents, teachers were placed second to the parent. For instance, in our school days I came to know a story about the reverence for teacher. On that anecdote, I saw a renowned bengali king ordered his son to put water on teachers feet. In addition, he ordered teacher to teach his son even he required to beat by cane. For this reason, the student on that story had no way to disregard on this teacher. Furthermore, he showed no brazen behavior in front of his teacher. This experience regarding the king claim suggest that teacher were venerable more in the past as the king himself involved to attest the respect for the teacher.
In sum, although it is true to argue with me by presenting other side of the given statement but in long run such claims will not be convinced. As teachers were not only respect in past for fear but also historical documents attested their reverence. So, we should practice to show respect to our teachers.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...to their teacher what actually teachers are deserving to get. Such respect reveals the studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, regarding, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84579439252 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63027251039 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502336448598 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9274814859 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201078410697 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670623985447 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500185333582 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138384634821 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402145832319 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...to their teacher what actually teachers are deserving to get. Such respect reveals the studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, regarding, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84579439252 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63027251039 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502336448598 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9274814859 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201078410697 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670623985447 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500185333582 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138384634821 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402145832319 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.