Protection of the environment has always been an important matter for every society, and human beings have tried to find the best method in order to enhance it. In this regard, some people believe that creating parks is the best way with which people can help the environment; some others think that stop using plastic bags can be the best solution; whereas I have enough reasons to object to those points of view, and I suppose that the access to public transportation should be increased. I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the more access to public transportation people have, the less personal car is used by them. So, less amount of carbon dioxide will be released to the air, and the environment will be protected. To put it in a more vivid picture, having access to public transportation easily, people tend to go to their workplace or other places with it. As a result, they do not use their own cars, so they use less gasoline, leading to less pollution release into the air. Thereby, the environment’s condition will improve. Take my hometown, for instance. People used to use their automobiles to go to their works since they did not have a good access to public transportation; however, since last year, when subway established in my city, people have been prone to leave their personal cars in their houses and have been encouraged to go to their workplaces with subway. As a result, the number of automobiles has fallen rapidly in the city, and we have had a clean environment since then.
Secondly, another factor which can make the best environment for people is quietness, which will be achieved, should people have better access to public transportation and do not use their personal cars. To clarify this point, cars’ engines are often noisy and produce different kinds of sound, which can harm people. As a way of illustration, take Tehran. There are a number of personal cars in its streets and they have distinctive types of engine which create a great deal of noise in that city. If people had a better access to public transportation in Tehran, there would be less personal cars on its roads, and people would have more sense of calmness which is a product of better environment.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that increasing access to public transportation is the best decision which people can make in order to refine and preserve the natural environment. It is due to the fact that, not only will production of carbon dioxide decline, but also noise pollution will decrease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good access'.
Suggestion: good access
... to their works since they did not have a good access to public transportation; however, sinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, i suppose, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83031674208 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74156712319 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47963800905 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1427069359 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245478763918 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818425788836 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608770689283 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158111715008 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317271457604 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.