It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Some people believe that borrowing money from a friend has some negative aspects and can either harm or damage a friendship. Personally, I believe that helping out a friend by leading some money, and getting it back on time won't hurt the friendship. I think it will strengthen the friendship, that is why I firmly disagree with the statement.
Financial situations have existed for so long and it is known that at some point one can face it. That is why some people must build strong bonds with friends throughout their life. If a financial situation rises, people know who they can count with. For example, when a friend had a health medical emergency in the previous month and is unable to pay his rent. He knows who would help him because they have formed a strong bond that makes them believe that they are for each other.
Moreover, a friend who has helped a friend in need is more likely to receive help in return. Borrowing money does not necessarily damage a friendship as far as it is paid back. For instance, a few years ago, I borrowed from a friend's $200, I promised him that I would pay it back the following week. However, the following week I was unable to work the entire week and my payment was short. I called on the day I promised my friend that I would repay him. I also explained why I was not able to pay him back. He understood me, and he thanked me for being honest with him. Fortunately, I repay him the coming week, since then, our friendships became even stronger than before.
On the other hand, people who often think that borrowing money from a friend can damage the friendship are because they have had bad experiences. For example, if a person borrows some money and does not pay it back. This action might bring some misunderstanding and people can start believing that a friendship is pointless. As a result, their friendship might fall apart. Additionally, some people are afraid to lend money to their new friends because they have unpleasant feelings and it is hard for them to believe again in a friendship. Friendship can also be damaged due to miscommunication.
Overall, a healthy and strong friendship is built on trust, love, communication, and empathy. Many people have lost the meaning of these words as a result of negative past experiences, but deep down they know that good friendship is still possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...tance, a few years ago, I borrowed from a friends 00, I promised him that I would pay it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... often think that borrowing money from a friend can damage the friendship are bec...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... of these words as a result of negative past experiences, but deep down they know that good frie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that good friendship is still possible.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6690647482 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66950102118 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7056503464 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.125 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22470427384 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746334111643 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626840883994 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135832995287 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778760766955 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.