It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer

Essay topics:

It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

Act of asking for a money in emergencies or certain situations is a common type of communication between friends. Personally, I believe that relationship will not be harmed due to borrowing money from companions. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will explore these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, the process of repaying will improve reliability, which means the relationship will become better. Many individuals pay their debt as soon as they become available to give it back instead of withholding. Therefore, their partners who receive their money and appreciation will think that people who are paying back their money is dependable. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. My female companion named Maral had been susceptible about me, and unwilling to believe me in every aspect, so we could not get close friends. However, two years ago, she gave me a money because I was in a critically important emergency. Later on, I paid the cash back once I solved my problem. Therefore, she started considering me a trustful man, so she stopped being always susceptible of my actions and words. Thanks to her changed perspective, we could advance our friendship from a head-nodding communication to close friends. This example demonstrates how borrowing can improve reliability of people.

Secondly, people who borrow money will understand how helpful their friends are. In fact, most individuals know that only friendly and kind individuals will give money to their friends if they ask for a favor. For instance, my brother said that he does not like his partner called Sara. However, Sara gave money my brother when he was unemployed, so he started thinking that Sara is a helpful woman. As a result, my brother started appreciating Sara’s personality, and became fine friends instead of hating her. If he had not borrowed bucks from Sara, he would have still disliking Sara.

In summation, I am of the opinion that borrowing money can improve relationships. This is because people lending money will deem their friends reliable while borrowers will appreciate the helpful quality of their companions. Thus, relationship will become even better because both borrower and debtor will appreciate each other’s characteristics.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
Act of asking for a money in emergencies or certain situations is...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, the process of repaying w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1021, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wing can improve reliability of people. Secondly, people who borrow money will u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ra, he would have still disliking Sara. In summation, I am of the opinion that b...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22070844687 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98224868432 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2135097593 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6818181818 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129660803912 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452295171554 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425321472083 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869199320329 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112856589491 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.