Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowledge is a crucial platform for human to develop in future life, which have a few forms to gain by learning from friends or teachers. Some outlook show that friends are able to solve or teach people when they get into information trouble rather than teachers and supervisors. I, as a fervent advocate of this statement, assure that it will be more better when people learning things with their friends.
To begin with, those who are in the same age and level in learning give us the information more similar and easy to approach. This is because, at the same level, each people have a formal way along with each other when conveying their idea, which means that there is no more abstract information offered by a higher level. Therefore, should people ask them to teach or transfer it back, it will absolutely comfortable since they remove some difficult concept and replace it with familiar viewpoint. For example, I used to be confused about some information about motivation in the physics class as the professor always illustrated a strange meaning with high speed. And my friend, who have better in absorb idea, teached it back to me and made it more clearly. As a result, I recognized that the knowledge was not difficult but the professor mind is too high.
Secondly, it is not uncomfortable when having a conversation or a debate with expertise. To be more accurate, talking to them makes students seem like they do not have a thick knowledge to deal with them, which means that people less give a opposite point. Furthermore, teachers and supervisors are not free since they have myriad classes and projects. Hence, fellow students is a better solution when people want to give and discuss their perspective. During the conversation, multiple sight will be conclude resulting in the better chance to accumulate a variety of knowledge. For example, I can have an hour to talking about physic with my friend and develop in question problems which make my knowledge more firm rather with the professor since I can resolve the concern immediately.
By way of conclusion, fellows are a excellent choice to build up our skill and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... this statement, assure that it will be more better when people learning things with their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to give'
Suggestion: to give
...e in the same age and level in learning give us the information more similar and eas...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'thick knowledge'.
Suggestion: thick knowledge
...kes students seem like they do not have a thick knowledge to deal with them, which means that peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...them, which means that people less give a opposite point. Furthermore, teachers a...
^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y. By way of conclusion, fellows are a excellent choice to build up our skill ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89344262295 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68872033807 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0517226121 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9375 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190016387179 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610749252983 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491300441606 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104394413913 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497280386547 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.