An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition
A doctor's success in his chosen field will be determined by the way he has treated his patients over his tenure. He will meet and treat hundreds of people in a month who need remedy for their diseases. However, if the doctor can share his past experiences and his record of treating to his novel patients, it would be a great advantage both to the doctor and the patient. Thus, I agree wiith the notion that an ailing patient must have access to the track record of the doctor who he reaches out to.
To begin with, if the doctor shares his past experiences, the patient can feel confident over his doctor. A widely known fact in the realm of the medical sciences is that a disease will be healed successfully if both the patient and the doctor have a mutual coordination and the ailing patient must be mentally fit. To achive this, the patient must have a belief in the doctor who treats him. For instance, there is a recent article in the public magazine that a patient who is suffering from cancer has lost all his hopes on his life. However, when he was treated by a world class doctor who has achieved many accolades in treating the disease, the patient survived. Even if the patient reached out to other doctors, there will not be much of difference in the Chemotherapy techniques used. However, the belief of the patient on the doctor has made him triumph over the disease.
Secondly, when a new patient is provided the analysis of the doctors experience in treating various patients of similar diseases, he can reach out to the people who were already treated and can choose other alternatives. Consider the case of a patient who is suffering from the sinus disease. The way of treatment for this disease depends on the doctor. Some doctors will heal it using medicines over a long period of time while others suggest surgery. Though both of the techniques ultimate aim is to heal the disease, a novice patient might be confounded to opt one technique. During this imbrogligo situation, the patient could meet the people who were already treated by using both the techniques under different doctors individually and come to a conclusion, taking the doctor's experience also into consideration.
In contrast, there will be some confidential information which cannot be revealed to the outside world in the medical field. This kind of information cannot be shared to the novice patients who require the treatment. Consider the example of neurological surgeries in which the treatment must be made depending on the condition of the patient. If the patient is not confident about the doctors ability, it would further debilitate his condition. At such instances, it is better not to reveal any doctors experience or past record.
To conclude, there are certain conditions when the doctor's record helps the patient to know whtether the doctor is capable of treating the disease or not. However, if the idea backfires during certain times, caution must be taken not to reveal any information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
A doctors success in his chosen field will be det...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
A doctors success in his chosen field will be determined by the way he has tr...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...s. However, if the doctor can share his past experiences and his record of treating to his novel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...To begin with, if the doctor shares his past experiences, the patient can feel confident over hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ill heal it using medicines over a long period of time while others suggest surgery. Though bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
... the patient is not confident about the doctors ability, it would further debilitate hi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in contrast, kind of, by the way, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85214007782 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63351983639 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439688715953 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4632788327 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.916666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79166666667 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371630357426 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123976339111 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788632299322 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232848180182 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777195185729 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.