The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There must be cooperation as well as competition between people for them to succeed. Cooperation between individuals helps them to achieve their goals while competition pushes one to make more difficult goals. A society must instill in its young people a sense of cooperation as well as competition to prepare them for leadership in government, industry, or other fields.
If two individuals with the same aspirations cooperate to complete a goal, then it becomes easier for them to achieve it. For example, cooperation between two individuals led to the creation of Apple. Steve Jobs was responsible for its marketing, while Steve Wozniack was responsible for the technical stuff. Now, Apple is one of the biggest companies in the planet. The cooperation between them was a key factor for this.
Competition between people can lead them to dream big. They might be focussed on outperforming others, and so might achieve difficult goals. For example, Tesla was the first car company to produce only electrical cars. Tesla is a successful company now. This prompted other car manufacturers like Mercedes to get into electrical cars. They haven't yet revealed a fully functional electric car. Once they do it, their car might perform better than Tesla's current cars, in which case, Tesla will have to make their cars even better in terms of mileage, distance travelled per unit of charge, charging time, top speed, acceleration, etc. This will make the existing electric cars even better. If Tesla had no competitor, then it will maintain a monoploy over electric cars; it may fix very high prices for its cars, and their quality needn't be top tier.
But, unhealthy competiton has its disadvantages. The animosity between competitors might make the environment inimical. To outperform the other, they might resort to using illegal methods. For instance, Volkswagen has revealed that it has used deceptive methods to pass the vechicle emission test. There was a sensor in the cars which sensed if the car was undergoing an emission test, in which case it limited the emission of gases; otherwise, it didn't control the emissions. This type of deceptive methods employed by companies doesn't help the general public. The image of such companies is tarnished when such scandals are revealed.
In conclusion, young people must be instilled with cooperation as well as healthy competition. This is the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...cedes to get into electrical cars. They havent yet revealed a fully functional electri...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: needn't
... prices for its cars, and their quality neednt be top tier. But, unhealthy competi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ed the emission of gases; otherwise, it didnt control the emissions. This type of dec...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...deceptive methods employed by companies doesnt help the general public. The image of s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 547, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s employed by companies doesnt help the general public. The image of such companies is tarnish...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18719211823 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80882362563 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524630541872 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2850698639 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267608344555 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763727094824 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111885220663 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193003327301 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124972102151 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.