According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising
The argument is cogent enough for numerous unwarranted assumptions it makes. Primarily, the argument assumes allocating a greater share of budget will increase the viewership but it fails to show any data about the entire movie market, and hence the argument is not plausible.
Taste of people changes with time and it does not follow any particular trend.What is praised today there is every possibility that it may be eschewed tomorrow. The argument says the decrease in viewership is entirely attributed to its advertising but there is a strong possibility that people who usually go to movies have no more enough spare time to spend after movies. Not only Super Screen Movie Production Company, a strong possibility, each and every movie company has observed a decrease in viewership due to public's lack of recreation time. Had the argument said explicitly that the entire movie market has remained quite same throughout the last few years but only the particular movie company is struggling only than we can accept the argument otherwise not.
However, even than the argument has to discuss about the economic conditions of people. It may happen that the economy is not running good and a recession is going on and thus people do not have enough money to spend after movie. On the other hand their interests on movies have remained same and they are now enjoying those movies by downloading them from various internet sources which do not require them a lot of money. Had the argument made its place clear about the fact that people have no other ways other than going to movie in order to enjoy the movies produced by that company, only than it would be more acceptable.
Meanwhile the argument's perception about the increase in positive movie reviews might be flawed. It may happen that, truly their movies are not so popular nowadays which makes the reviewers to be reluctant to make a movie review and the reviewers who reviewed for the movie are the ones who are strong follower of that company and hence the percentage of positive reviews have increased. The negative reviews previously came from, may be, were from various popular news media who at first analyze the public reaction on the movie and then give their reviews and public's disinterested attitude makes them reluctant to write movie reviews.
At the same time, it may be not the movies but the condition of the movie theater which is preventing people to enjoy the movies at that theater. So, the company should provide extra budget for reconstruct their movie theaters to increase viewership.
The argument is flawed for various unwarranted assumptions.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 442 350
No. of Characters: 2158 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.585 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.882 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.491 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.752 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.16 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
...it does not follow any particular trend.What is praised today there is every possibi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in viewership due to publics lack of recreation time. Had the argument said e...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...nly than it would be more acceptable. Meanwhile the arguments perception about the incr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...uld be more acceptable. Meanwhile the arguments perception about the increase in positi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, may, so, then, thus, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 441.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98412698413 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54523809271 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473922902494 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1798924411 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.375 119.503703932 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5625 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342001552968 0.218282227539 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112092596678 0.0743258471296 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774553361871 0.0701772020484 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152737576929 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893203803723 0.0628817314937 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.