"All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years, several accidents in and around Centerville have involved teenage drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that they are too busy to teach their teenagers to drive, some other instruction is necessary to ensure that these teenagers are safe drivers. Although there are two driving schools in Centerville, parents on a tight budget cannot afford to pay for driving instruction. Therefore an effective and mandatory program sponsored by the high school is the only solution to this serious problem."
The author concludes that in order to decrease the number of accidents happening, a mandatory programe should be started by Centerville high school. The author concludes this on the basis of assumptions; increase in road accidents during last two years, too busy schedule of the parents and only two driving schools in the city which everyone cannot afford. At first sight these assumptions seem to bolster the conclusion but on meticulous analysis otherwise. The reasons for the failure of the author's conclusion are described below;
Firstly, the author said that in the number of accidents during last two years involved teenagers. But neither the number of teenagers involved is mentioned nor did the cause of accident. It may be possible that accident might had happened because of some other reasons rather than unguidedness of teenagers. However, the other possible reason of increasing road accidents may the laxity in government rules and regulations.
Secondly, author said that the parents are too busy that they cannot taught their children how to drive. But as we all know that parents are first teacher in everyone's life, the most basic things about driving such as to stop at red light one learns from his parents. And the second most impressing thing is that parents are the one who provide vehicles to their children, it is the foremost duty of the parents is to not allow their children to drive in public places until they don't know how to drive properly.
Last but not least, it is said that there are only two driving schools in the city and the most parents cannot afford them and according to author the only solution to this is that Centerville high school should start driving course. However,the other solutions to this solution are plaussible like opening of new driving schools, reducing the fee of these schools.
In the sum the author's conclusion was fallacious because it was based on totally biased assumptions. To demonstrate the conclusion the author should provide more additional information on number of accidents happened in past two years and the percentage of teenagers in that, about rules and regulations of the government, pay scale of the most of the parents, on the basis of which further analysis can be taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me should be started by Centerville high school. The author concludes this on the...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ise. The reasons for the failure of the authors conclusion are described below; Firstl...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... It may be possible that accident might had happened because of some other reaso...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...en to drive in public places until they dont know how to drive properly. Last but n...
^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ool should start driving course. However,the other solutions to this solution are pl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e fee of these schools. In the sum the authors conclusion was fallacious because it wa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 376.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01329787234 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61998054231 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484042553191 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3104714234 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.642857143 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1804195995 0.218282227539 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657165490083 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062037060038 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102037545609 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445826022906 0.0628817314937 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 98.500998004 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.