Argue 157: The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores.“Five years ago Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent after their ads began appe

Essay topics:

Argue 157: The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores.

“Five years ago Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent after their ads began appearing in the magazine. The three Fish Emporium stores in Gulf City saw an even greater increase than that. Because Top Dog Pet Stores is based in Gulf City, it seems clear that we should start placing our own ads in Exotic Pets Monthly. If we do so, we will be sure to reverse the recent trend of declining sales and start making a profit again.”

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

In this memo, the director argues that Top Dog Pet Stores should follow Fish Emporium to start making a profit again. Although the argument seems solid for the first glance, the unsubstantiated assumptions lead me to question the soundness of the argument.

First, the director assumes that the advertisement in Exotic Pet Monthly yields the profit increase directly. However, the profit increase may be originated from other factors such as the good economic condition of the society and the position of the Gulf City. Raising a pet needs substantial money, so it is plausible that it is affected by the economic condition of society significantly. Besides, if the position of the Gulf City is beside the gulf, then the citizens of Gulf City may familiar with the ocean creatures, and the interest about the fishes maybe larger concerning other cities also.

Second, the assumption that the director made about the background of the commercial is not credible. Since the commercial was posted five years ago in the magazine, so it may bring different effects nowadays. The interest of the citizens, the economic condition of the citizen, and even the spare time to raise the pet of the citizen may different compared with the five years ago. Also, 15% of the profit increase is possibly minute quantity if the original profit is low. For example, if the original profit is $100, then the profit they earn through the advertisement is only $15.

Lastly, the director assumes that the recent trend of declining sales may be diverted through the advertisement, and raise the profit of Top Dog Pet Stores. What if recent declining is not due to the lack of advertisement, but due to the other factors such as decreasing preference of the customers for the pet? Since there are many possible reasons for the sales declination, the declining trend may not be affected by the advertisement. Even if the recent declining tendency is because of the lack of advertisement, the advertising fee is needed for the advertisement. If the advertising fee overcomes the income that they possibly earn, then the advertisement is not the profit for Top Dog Pet Stores.

In brief, the author’s claim is unconvincing on many grounds. To bolster the argument, the author needs to support additional information that reinforces the aforementioned assumptions.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...es maybe larger concerning other cities also. Second, the assumption that the dir...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, for example, in brief, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 385.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0961038961 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94511553513 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462337662338 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5115597053 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.0 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209165275129 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707809247088 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820468499303 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110337850208 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611687530344 0.0628817314937 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 385 350
No. of Characters: 1905 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.43 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.948 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.826 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.057 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.123 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5