Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. A better alternative is to add a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, and so would reduce rush-hour traffic rather than fostering an increase.
This argument is all about the resolution towards increased rush-hour traffic on Blue-Highway between the suburbs and the city center that has doubled during the commuting time by the add-on of the motorist’s lobby and hence widen the highway; thereby widening the highway! However, referring to last year’s impact about additional lane to the nearby Green Highway led to an unexpected effect which resulted in the worsening of traffic jams on it. I would like to support the proposed alternative solution to this problem in the above statement.
First of all, it is not necessary that the implementation of one change that resulted in support of that modification would be generating similar after effects for the other area as well in terms of its population density, geographical region etc. Although the problems that have been perseverant could be common and stagnant but the best possible solutions may definitely alter in their structure accompanied by slight flexibilities. Moreover, we shall also look after the side effects of the new ideas that are being introduced in terms of their intervention with resources already present and nature as well.
Secondly, there is nothing wrong with the widening of additional lane but the kind of vehicles it is being entertained for, matters a lot. Also, referring to the recent records of the area where this idea had been implemented did not fetch quite a satisfactory reflection as per the expectations. Instead, it bore a totally distinct result with a substantial increase of traffic. Moreover, the motor lobby proposal doesn’t sound to be great and helpful since it would definitely be creating more space but at the same time, it would also entertain an exponential rate of pollution increase.
Apart from this, we shall first look after the maximum usage of a particular vehicle-type around that area for the locales. As mentioned in the reference statement, many of the area residents are a keen bicyclist, which sound wonderful and highlights the successful possibility of this proposed idea. It would also encourage the go-green initiative and lessen the pollution feed to the environment. Moreover, it would also invite more bicycle users in accordance with their usage-limitations. Hence, I would favor the initiative with the modified proposed idea of an additional lane for bicycle enthusiasts; thereby encouraging a clean and green nation.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1986 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.145 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.891 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.973 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.324 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, apart from, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 385.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3012987013 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02015046331 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 204.123752495 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.9793676953 57.8364921388 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.785714286 119.503703932 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.70786347227 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274050805356 0.218282227539 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721805664831 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132500766102 0.0701772020484 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17570017672 0.128457276422 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190555934591 0.0628817314937 303% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.