The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
This issue talks all about the accurate assessment of a popular musician after he is dead for several generations in accordance with his fame not being interrupted with an honest judgment.
I think I do not agree completely with this opinion since the way I look upon a particular Musician is with the work he does currently. We as an audience make a huge difference to an artist’s subsequent works imperatively. Their upcoming work majorly depends on the response they receive from the variety of works they have presented before us. The audience’s review is the real assessment for them.
For instance, we may take the example of Lata Mangeshkar. She has done an amazing work all throughout her career. Even after 15-20 years post her work, the old melodies are valued and appreciated along with her latest ones as well. Sir A.R. Rahman is the second biggest example in these terms. His compositions are evergreen and his worthy work has paid no less than a musician who is no more and is being praised by the public after several years of his/her demise.
To summarize, we may present that the honest assessment cannot ever intervene with the factors like the aftermath of the talent post the demise. The real work pays off there and then. Moreover, it is really good to observe that the artists get remembered by the public/audience , even after they are no more present in this world in front of them and still the work pays off, even post several years of their passing-by. But it is also true that it is not necessary to be assessed on the tenure basis. A worthy work never sees a time but the performance and its after effects in the hearts of the respective followers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hy work has paid no less than a musician who is no more and is being praised by t...
^^
Line 6, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts get remembered by the public/audience , even after they are no more present in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, still, then, well, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72297297297 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68636654295 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8741590672 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263151083223 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824386476504 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955109055751 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184713788381 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109929969951 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.