The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
This article about the concern related to the consequences of overdevelopment in the Maple Country, is what almost every other other developed and some developing countries are currently facing. Development usually stands for eradicating the non industrial land involving the forest land, farmland to the new day technological sounding buildings. This has major impact on the lifestyle of the citizens which requires qualitative and quantitative comprehension.
The proponents of the measure instancing the Chestnut County, stated that after establishing a similar measures ten years ago have observed only a modest increase in the house prices. The proponents here fail to give us a statistical result of the survey. Similarly even the opponents by giving example of Pine Country where the housing prices, apparently, have doubled after establishing a similar measure 15 years ago.
After apprehending both the sides view, its ostensible that there are many more yardsticks which both the sides have failed to present. Just the housing price isn't the correct measure to quantify the expense of living. The fact of housing prices being utterly influenced by the economy of the country has been completely ignored. A data related to the change in food expenditure with the implementation of this measure, would have provided us a better notion of how farmland has been effected.
The fact that with the developing or developed countries, comes the new and affordable technology. This implies progress would have definitely been made on improvising the productivity of farms. So restricting the resources of technology to distribute to the already self sufficient agriculture sector, would be a waste of resources.This point could have definitely made the opponent's argument stronger.
If the article could have focused more on potraying the facts and figures of the other criterion as mentioned above the decison process would have been a lot more easier.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...the Maple Country, is what almost every other other developed and some developing countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...us a statistical result of the survey. Similarly even the opponents by giving example of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...iled to present. Just the housing price isnt the correct measure to quantify the exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...e sector, would be a waste of resources.This point could have definitely made the op...
^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...is point could have definitely made the opponents argument stronger. If the article c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e decison process would have been a lot more easier.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 304.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47039473684 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01200671816 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2959085202 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102103800626 0.218282227539 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331000553723 0.0743258471296 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365285661466 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531266941581 0.128457276422 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359098097247 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32208582834 120% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...the Maple Country, is what almost every other other developed and some developing countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...us a statistical result of the survey. Similarly even the opponents by giving example of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...iled to present. Just the housing price isnt the correct measure to quantify the exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...e sector, would be a waste of resources.This point could have definitely made the op...
^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...is point could have definitely made the opponents argument stronger. If the article c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e decison process would have been a lot more easier.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 304.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47039473684 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01200671816 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2959085202 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102103800626 0.218282227539 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331000553723 0.0743258471296 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365285661466 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531266941581 0.128457276422 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359098097247 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32208582834 120% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.