The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay Last year the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lower than the year before Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection a company that

Essay topics:

The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.

"Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lower than the year before. Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection, a company that had serviced local garbage collection for the past twenty years. We switched at that time to Satellite Waste Corporation, another trash collection company. In nearby Ocean Harbor, where Arko has continued to provide garbage collection, the beaches are experiencing record levels of attendance. Meanwhile, in Bridge Bay, complaints about garbage on our beach have increased this year. Clearly, inadequate garbage collection on our beach by Satellite has led to the significant drop in visitors. Therefore, in order to restore visitor numbers to our local beach, we recommend resuming our contract with Arko as soon as possible."

The city manager of Bridge Bay recommends to resume the contract with older garbage collection company called Arko Trash collection, effectively terminating the contract with Satellite Waste Corporation. Statistics considered for this recommendation is minute and non substantial. Hence, the prediction of inadequate garbage collection on our beach by Satellite has led to the significant drop in visitors is contignent upon several questions that must be answered to properly evaluate the validity of the argument.

The argument starts with a data documenting visitors last year are 50 percent less than the year before. But this doesn't include the situation before the last two years. This definitely looks like a loophole and given an opprtunity there is a higher possibility of people raising questions on the pre historic events. The solution to this would be provide a trend for last 10 years or more. One year is too less of a time to judge the reason behind the decline of visitors. If there's a case provided where there was either increase or a constant count of visitors to the local beach from the last 10 plus years but a sudden decrease of 50 % is observed, in such cases it is clearly implied that trash collector plays a major role here.

In futherance, the reason behind replacement of Arko Trash Collection, which had serviced the local garbage collection for past twenty years is not presented. Obviously the decision taken to replace the Trash collector wouldn't be taken unreasonably. There could be a cost factor or any factor which needs to be reconsidered now in case the demands of restoring the contract with Arko Trash Collection is raised. Hence, any factor, be it a minor factor, strengthens the argument in case the factor is in the argument's favor.

Finally,the essay also stated that surrounding Ocean Harbor where Arko has continued to provide garbage collection experiences a record level of attendance. It is essential to present here the trends observed in the last decades in the surrounding beaches as well. There is a plausibility of the increasing popularity of the beach due to many reasons like a recent recreation centre opened near the surrounding beach causing to increase the attendance in this beach in turn leading to abate in the count of visits in the local beach of Bridge Bay.

In conclusion, despite it is observed that complaints about garbage has increased on the local beach and a reduction in the number of visits, there is no direct relation observed. The recommendation is based on the assumptions given is rife with unwarranted claims and open to the questions stated above that must be answered satisfactorily to prove the plausibility of such presentments.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommends resuming'.
Suggestion: recommends resuming
The city manager of Bridge Bay recommends to resume the contract with older garbage collect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ent less than the year before. But this doesnt include the situation before the last t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ason behind the decline of visitors. If theres a case provided where there was either ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...on taken to replace the Trash collector wouldnt be taken unreasonably. There could be a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...or is in the arguments favor. Finally,the essay also stated that surrounding Ocea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...ened near the surrounding beach causing to increase the attendance in this beach in turn le...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, look, so, then, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 448.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08928571429 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93135875026 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.281276502 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345963946396 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925307582545 0.0743258471296 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799322824687 0.0701772020484 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158982828244 0.128457276422 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746133489247 0.0628817314937 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 98.500998004 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 451 350
No. of Characters: 2236 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.608 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.958 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.86 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.153 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.389 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5