While it may be plausible that “Shakespeare in the Park” program rises revenues for “Classical Shakespeare Theatre”, this author’s claim doesn’t make a logical case for increasing the audiences based on past ‘Free Plays in the Park’ memories. It is too easy to perceive why there was a downturn in the number of audience, but this argument is trifle with guesses and assumptions. Thus, not strong enough flow to lunch the program.
Firstly, there could be plenty reasons for decline in profits. For example, the quality of performance can become worsen and therefore deterring visitors. Director of the play could suddenly quit, leaving a young inexperienced learner-replacement, which could again reflect on derp of performance. Has the theater invested enough in decorations, costumes and scenery construction? Is the building hygrine clean and neat? Is a buffet working properly, providing variety of refreshments during intermission? Also, it’s possible that the price of tickets has been recently jacked up, which in effect, stopped many people from visiting. Many of variables need to be checked and if any of them has changed that would lead to reevaluation of the author’s conclusion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 2260.96107784 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 441.139720559 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63829787234 5.12650576532 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.56307096286 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42462324409 2.78398813304 123% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.702127659574 0.468620217663 150% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 705.55239521 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.9139400721 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 23.324526521 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.70786347227 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138445641628 0.218282227539 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028328571654 0.0743258471296 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532387219665 0.0701772020484 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103678416445 0.128457276422 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579185849594 0.0628817314937 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.5979740519 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32208582834 123% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.