The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population gro

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.

"To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument

The WAAC radio station’s manager claims for a change in the format that they usually propose based on missing evidence.

The first piece of evidence which is needed in order to evaluate the first conclusion of the manager about the necessity to change the rock-music format is to investigate which is the main reason why the number of radio listeners is declining. Indeed, the manage readily assumes that the change in the type of music streamed is necessary to reverse the decline in listener numbers. However, it could be the case that current population in the area where WAAC is located do not listen anymore to the radio station because of different reasons. For instance, it could be that there has been an increase in the time dedicated to advertising and less time for music. Or, new podcasts have been introduced which have supplanted others which radio listeners do not enjoy. Therefore, the first piece of evidence needed is any mention about why people living in this area is currently reducing their time listening to WAAC.

Moreover, the manager aims to make listeners the retirees moving to the area where WAAC is broadcasted. He assumes that they would not like the rock-music format and that the radio should change to a format which is coherent with their tastes. However, no mention has been made about how those aged people enjoy their spare time. Maybe they do not even listen to radio. In this case, the change in the rock-music format would not have any effect. In addition, the manager claims that no one is interested in music since CDs sales are declining. First, the fact that people do not buy CDs anymore does not imply that their interest in music id declining. And then, for which category of music CDs sales are going down? If it is for rap music or pop music the manager should not be worried about his rock-music format.

The manger also claims a switch to news and talk format which is becoming increasingly popular in the area, but he did not question about whether people actually like this kind of format. Indeed, if other radios in the area are experiencing a decline in listeners then maybe this new format could be a reason. If this is the case, WAAC should not change to news and talk format.

In conclusion, the conclusions done by the managers are completely based on faulty assumptions and they need more evidence in order to be evaluated. Why the current population is reducing the listening of WAAC, the size of the retirees moving to the area and their tastes and whether citizens in the area like the new format of news and talk broadcasted by other radios

Votes
Average: 5.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f radio listeners is declining. Indeed, the manage readily assumes that the change in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 456.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77631578947 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44344207305 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412280701754 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1589121061 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221307004517 0.218282227539 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807991257126 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550564403921 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133748739407 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422928867008 0.0628817314937 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.5979740519 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 456 350
No. of Characters: 2110 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.621 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.627 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.341 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.39 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.514 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5