In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far fewer sick days than employees working in buildings cleaned with other cleansers. Therefore, to prevent employee illness, all companies should use CleanAll as their industrial cleanser.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argument presents cleanser used would prevent illness of the office staff depending widely on the assumption that clean office means no disease that direct us to employee if caught by disease its the dirt office where it came from. Furthermore, he claim is based on killing bacteria and dirt around office is panacea, what about other pathogens. All of these is tending towards no sick leave there is surely no one is sick , that might not be the case at all, some employee might be working in a diseased condition,no one knows.
At first there is a claim that it kill bacteria and removes dirt in the office and goes to say this makes person away from disease, but wait a second people also get some viral disease - most frequent the common cold by Rhino virus - and other nematodes and tapeworm are causing illness to human from the ancient time till date, then not to ignore them in health issue. This assumption ignoring these causal organism, if these had been in facts of the argument the conclusion would have been certain. However, missing these makes it cleaning with the CleanAll cleanser alone is not to keeping all the staff healthy and away from all kind of health problems.
The presenter argues that keeping office clean makes employee away from the disease or illness. Nevertheless, every person have a lot of places to travel, eat, drink and as a whole live that the clean office. Mr. X from the office can go to the nearest burger house for having lunch and get a food poisoning. Other can get a disease from whole of the disease known to affect human in any place or time other than office. For instance, at the crowded stations, fruit market are places easily transferring communicable disease for all. So, CleanAll in office is not cure or overall formula to keep staffs safe from disease.
No sick leave is not the meaning that every body is ok and healthy. Office is place of work and sometime or even more often time minor health issue aren't claimed leave, that is why it is not indication of healthy office.
Therefore, bacteria to make people ill, office to get people sick and no sick leave reveals healthy staff are to be checked with correct measure as mentioned that would for every possible reason not the prevention of illness. Thus, for claiming using CleanAll for its benefits make disease away is not sufficent taking in account a related facts.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 421 350
No. of Characters: 1922 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.53 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.565 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.197 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.415 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.585 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ect us to employee if caught by disease its the dirt office where it came from. Fur...
^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...ice where it came from. Furthermore, he claim is based on killing bacteria and dirt a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f these is tending towards no sick leave there is surely no one is sick , that mi...
^^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ck leave there is surely no one is sick , that might not be the case at all, some...
^^
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , no
...might be working in a diseased condition,no one knows. At first there is a claim t...
^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...senter argues that keeping office clean makes employee away from the disease or illne...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...even more often time minor health issue arent claimed leave, that is why it is not in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fact'?
Suggestion: fact
...t sufficent taking in account a related facts.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 419.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69451073986 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29927311526 2.78398813304 83% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508353221957 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0709201735 57.8364921388 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.9375 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 23.324526521 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.70786347227 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120923976215 0.218282227539 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427168572943 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306315636369 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697677268284 0.128457276422 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208769109838 0.0628817314937 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.