Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direct more funding towards humanitarian science projects.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to consider specific instances for which this statement may or may not be true.
The fund from government to all of the sector are equally important for the development of the country and welfare of the public. However, government is bringing equality in the sense of equity and give the fund as per the requirement of each sector. In doing so the space works is kind of too expensive parts and humanitarian sector can do well enough with much smaller amount. Now, when it comes to curtailing or reducing one's part for increase in other then situational analysis is beneficial and effective than vaguely state that this part would be a better receiver. The focus should be the country's goal of achievement, what it is try to get in next few year, and what the people are in need for the country which id more deserving in the context. Also, whether the shifting of budget works well or is worthless.
The country which has a lot to do for the people, where people are in need for help to carry out daily needs, these countries should not be going for a purely scientific endeavor. Even if people are in a good condition but the country lacks the highest of the technology and fairly all of its citizens are lacking facilities of may be health, sanitation, transportation or other needs. This is sure the budget from the part should be shifted for humanitarian works as to get infrastructure facilities, get facilities of the deprived communities, work of better conditions of the labor. If the country like Nepal where at far nook and corners people are unaware of even a science discovery like computer or phones what it would achieve from travelling to the moon or building a rocket. There should be a increase of budget in these countries.
For the developed countries too the first focus should be given to the humanitarian work and welfare of the country. But wait it doesn't mean that the whole of the budget for humanitarian in this country come from the science substitute and we also familiar to facts some private works are also going on for the pure science. Sometimes, lets say the endeavor to create a fastest of airplane and the smart phones were also purely scientific but after this become a part of life we can say it had been a humanitarian need. So in context of a developed country should be an equity approach to give the commensurate amount of budget from the government for each sectors.
See something from space perspective now, what if you consider significance of results from the pure sciences we developed satellites and technology that made our life too easy and convenient. Moreover, going for a space can bring us new advances, may be anew home or simply new inventions. Thus , in highest of the advanced countries the humanitarian part is fulfilled already and it time to go for science and require no shift of budget away from science.
Accordingly, the context of the country is determinant whether to shift budget from the science to humanitarian. I feel that developing country should go for it while the developed ones have no good going for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
The fund from government to all of the sector are equally important for the de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...when it comes to curtailing or reducing ones part for increase in other then situati...
^^^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
...g or reducing ones part for increase in other then situational analysis is beneficial and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...educing ones part for increase in other then situational analysis is beneficial and ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'few years'.
Suggestion: few years
...ievement, what it is try to get in next few year, and what the people are in need for th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ientific endeavor. Even if people are in a good condition but the country lacks t...
^^
Line 2, column 802, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n or building a rocket. There should be a increase of budget in these countries. ...
^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...and welfare of the country. But wait it doesnt mean that the whole of the budget for h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...etimes, lets say the endeavor to create a fastest of airplane and the smart phone...
^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anew home or simply new inventions. Thus , in highest of the advanced countries th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, i feel, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72761904762 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73636958151 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455238095238 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2900359484 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.1 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206401033211 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702838151621 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324306643863 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127699093134 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207874624473 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.