many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. however, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit

Essay topics:

many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. however, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculation, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.

The statement feels to be true at first but the author has made many assumptions for which he has not given any strong proofs and neither has the author considered other factors like cost , effectiveness and also the chances that the flu would relapse.

First assumption that the author makes is that many life might be saved if inoculations were routinely administered to all the people. The author should have specified the severity of cow flu. And routine administration of all the residents of the area where flu is detected is not a logical approach considering that there is no proof of getting a positive result.The author could have provided the statistics of the people save by this approach which would have helped to strengthen or weaken the argument.

Furthermore the author mentions the possibilities of fatality as a result of inoculation, but fails to mention the ratio to fatalities due to flu to that due to inoculation. What if the fatalities caused by inoculations outnumbers fatalities caused by flu ? then there would be no discussion of considering the idea of inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.

The mentioned assumptions by the author but because no proof of examples to bolster the claim this arguments have no legs to stand .

Votes
Average: 3.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uthor considered other factors like cost , effectiveness and also the chances that...
^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ssumption that the author makes is that many life might be saved if inoculations wer...
^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s no proof of getting a positive result.The author could have provided the statisti...
^^^
Line 9, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...trengthen or weaken the argument. Furthermore the author mentions the possibilities o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...s outnumbers fatalities caused by flu ? then there would be no discussion of conside...
^^^^
Line 13, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... proof of examples to bolster the claim this arguments have no legs to stand .
^^^^
Line 13, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...aim this arguments have no legs to stand .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 2260.96107784 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 212.0 441.139720559 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02520867161 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 204.123752495 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 705.55239521 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.8616681438 57.8364921388 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23933941044 0.218282227539 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113605131873 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839462407399 0.0701772020484 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123895615079 0.128457276422 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102292041679 0.0628817314937 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.3799401198 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.