Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The argument states that lives of many people can be saved if frequent administration of inoculation had been done against cow flu in the areas where the disease is being detected. But there are chances that a person may die because of such inoculation, so thereby concluding that the frequent inoculations against cow flu should be banned which is a flawed conclusion in itself.
The first flaw in the given argument is that it is not yet proven that inoculation is the proven method against cow flu which can save people from cow flu. It might be possible that by using these method against cow flu can result in more deaths. So first of all we have to find the best and suitable method which can resist cow flu from affecting people.
The argument states that we should search at that place which are already affected from cow flu but the areas which had already affected by cow flu at first would be the area which are not affected by cow flu. So to circumspect only that areas which are already affected is not the appropriate way, they should check all the areas which are affected and not affected because it might possible that the area which are not affected has been started to get affected and is spreading at a great rate. And the worst scenario regarding this would be the cow flu can spread widely if early precaution are not taken because the best way is to take preventive measures before the necessity arise.
There could also be another possibilty behnd the death of a person rather than inoculation. So to ban the frequent administration of inoculation is not at all te best option and we cannot come to a conclusion before we had not checked all the possibilities or the causes behind the death of a perosn. So we need to first analyze properly that what is the main reason behind a persons death and then come to a conclusion and after analyzing we could take effective measures to prevent cow flu.
So based upon the flaws the conclusion is a flawed one because they has only considered and talked about the inoculation and not of other factors which could lead to death.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: There could also be another possibilty behnd the death of a person rather than inoculation.
Error: behnd Suggestion: behind
Error: inoculation Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: possibilty Suggestion: possibility
Sentence: So to ban the frequent administration of inoculation is not at all te best option and we cannot come to a conclusion before we had not checked all the possibilities or the causes behind the death of a perosn.
Error: inoculation Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: te Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: perosn Suggestion: person
Sentence: So based upon the flaws the conclusion is a flawed one because they has only considered and talked about the inoculation and not of other factors which could lead to death.
Error: inoculation Suggestion: No alternate word
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 376 350
No. of Characters: 1700 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.403 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.521 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.465 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.664 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.917 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.717 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.254 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
...flu. It might be possible that by using these method against cow flu can result in more deat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'te the best'.
Suggestion: te the best
...nistration of inoculation is not at all te best option and we cannot come to a conclusi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...y that what is the main reason behind a persons death and then come to a conclusion and...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fective measures to prevent cow flu. So based upon the flaws the conclusion is ...
^^
Line 9, column 69, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...conclusion is a flawed one because they has only considered and talked about the in...
^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther factors which could lead to death.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 13.6137724551 162% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 376.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60638297872 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48971969603 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417553191489 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8049460758 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 23.324526521 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30084584539 0.218282227539 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134764226571 0.0743258471296 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882049394705 0.0701772020484 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176256228978 0.128457276422 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106889976318 0.0628817314937 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.5979740519 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.