"Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author of the statement believes that the regularly administrations for cow flu vaccines should not be permitted because the vaccines has a small possibility to cause people to die from the inoculation. Ostensibly, the vaccines would lead to the unwanted fatal results and with no permission on the inoculation this could be utterly prevented. However, before the statement is adopted by any health department officials, the author needs to address several questions about its possible flaws.
First and foremost, the author overlooks that the cow flu is a severe infectious disease and can ca...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 484 350
No. of Characters: 2438 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.69 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.037 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.91 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 178 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 102 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 34.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.212 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.654 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.161 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1506, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ket for preventing cow flu. If not, the authors conclusion might be overly ideal and un...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...rom the side effect of the inoculation. in that case, the author should obtain mor...
^^
Line 1, column 2540, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider modifying'.
Suggestion: consider modifying
...cts. The author then should accordingly consider to modify the statement to allow part of the peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2652, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s to receive the inoculation and obtain the protect of the disease. In a nutshell, the auth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 16.3942115768 183% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 484.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10537190083 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96314344516 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429752066116 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 793.8 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4866911334 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.733333333 119.503703932 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2666666667 23.324526521 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 5.70786347227 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401100468424 0.218282227539 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158884395942 0.0743258471296 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195155568346 0.0701772020484 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401100468424 0.128457276422 312% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.3799401198 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.