Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
In the world we live in, it has witnessed a lot of changes every decade, or even every year. For example, changes in human anatomy, not a major one, but its not a an ignored fact that our heights are decreasing with respect to our ancestors.There could be reson for that. And thats being still researched.
Now lets move on to the point when we get ill. Nowadays we are treated with chemicals and intense surgeries when we are in pain or when we are required for some internal changes that can't be done through medicine. We have got some herbal procedures as well for treatments. But the fact of treatment with bones has not been the case in any one of the procedures.
Even though proponents claim that consuming bone broth acts as an anecdote for curing chronic disease, the statements of the skeptics can't be ignored. Truly cartilage ingested can't produce cartilage.
Thinking logically and from the medical point of view, when we ingest something it has to be captured by our disesase healing cells to help them fight against the disease. Dead bones do not provide a source of healing nature in bodies of this generation. And are usually consumed by the earthly matters to increase the fertility. Well of course our body works in a different way compared to the earth internal mechanism or any other species on planet.
Well the evidence provided can't be disproved as well. But it now depends on the human metabolism. It is also said that our ancestors lived on raw flesh and forest leaves. But we all know that if a human of this generation consumes that same raw flesh, he/she will fall into a pit of deadly diseases.
So with generations we can say that the internal body mechanisms shifts in a different direction and the uninterruptable medical research on human body, gives us a proof of this. We can conclude that even though our ancestors have treated themselves with many unimaginable things, as with time we have changes can't inherit those without proper and complete research on it.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 352 350
No. of Characters: 1622 1500
No. of Different Words: 196 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.331 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.608 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.489 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.161 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.28 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.569 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n anatomy, not a major one, but its not a an ignored fact that our heights are de...
^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
...n anatomy, not a major one, but its not a an ignored fact that our heights are decre...
^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ecreasing with respect to our ancestors.There could be reson for that. And thats bein...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...tors.There could be reson for that. And thats being still researched. Now lets move...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...required for some internal changes that cant be done through medicine. We have got s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...disease, the statements of the skeptics cant be ignored. Truly cartilage ingested ca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt be ignored. Truly cartilage ingested cant produce cartilage. Thinking logically...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ertility. Well of course our body works in a different way compared to the earth internal mechanis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n planet. Well the evidence provided cant be disproved as well. But it now depend...
^^^^
Line 11, column 311, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...le things, as with time we have changes cant inherit those without proper and comple...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, as to, for example, of course, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 350.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73714285714 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60564692895 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8024069795 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2631578947 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118324193108 0.218282227539 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383717875023 0.0743258471296 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369484243468 0.0701772020484 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660800422012 0.128457276422 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021677188252 0.0628817314937 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.