Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They

Essay topics:

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

In the given arguement, the author has mentioned that by intake Paleo diets there are so many benefits for mordern human-being. On basis of his arguements he come up with conclusion that ancient human knew about there physiology that we do not know and we can cure many chronic illness. I am completely against the arguement suggested by author. There are many flaw in the assumptions made in the arguement. The arguement contains lot of holes and bullets in it. Many valid examples will be provided to prove my point of view.

In the first example, author claims that our body is evolve to eat these type of soup made by cooking animal bones. The main flaw in the assumption is that he did not mentioned about the digestive system of mordern human being. It may be possible that this type of food is favorable to ancient people not for mordern humans. To improve this flaw, relevant examples on diegestion ofmordern human should be provided by the author.

Secondly, author claims that strong evidence were present that the people who consume bone broth has fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases as compared to others. Now the flaw in his assumptions is that he has not given enough data on which several conclusion can be made. To improve this flaw, appropriate data should be provided by author to take care of all the things.

Additionally, he points out that ancient human knew something about our physiology. And by eating Paleo diets they keep away themselves from chronic illness. Now the main flaw in this arguement is that it may be possible that ancient people do not know other thinbgs to eat that's why they used to consume the Paleo diets.

In short, on basis of author's assumption there are many flaws in it.To improve these flaws, many pragmatic examplkes were provided. The author should work on this flaws so that one can reach upon any conclusion. Pablo diets may be useful to mordern human being but author should , mention its major merits. In this way, the major flaws will be improved.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun flaw seems to be countable; consider using: 'many flaws'.
Suggestion: many flaws
...rguement suggested by author. There are many flaw in the assumptions made in the arguemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'flaws'?
Suggestion: flaws
...ent suggested by author. There are many flaw in the assumptions made in the arguemen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'evolved'.
Suggestion: evolved
...example, author claims that our body is evolve to eat these type of soup made by cooki...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...aw in the assumption is that he did not mentioned about the digestive system of mordern h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conclusion seems to be countable; consider using: 'several conclusions'.
Suggestion: several conclusions
...t he has not given enough data on which several conclusion can be made. To improve this flaw, appr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...people do not know other thinbgs to eat thats why they used to consume the Paleo diet...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...s assumption there are many flaws in it.To improve these flaws, many pragmatic exa...
^^
Line 17, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to mordern human being but author should , mention its major merits. In this way, ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, secondly, so, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 349.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81948424069 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44588116921 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495702005731 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2666981726 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35 5.70786347227 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166217549976 0.218282227539 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550852563787 0.0743258471296 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752634312041 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104803038427 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721012617984 0.0628817314937 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 350 350
No. of Characters: 1629 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.325 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.654 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.372 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.384 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.317 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.533 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5