A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In the given prompt, it suggests that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum until they enter college. As my point of view, I am completely against the recommendation made in this issue. A nation should should focus on the needs of every indiviual student and framework should be designed in such a manner that it would be beneficial for all the students. Relevant examples will be provided to prove the validity of the point of view.
Firstly, let's consider the example of India which is known for diversity in culture, religion and even languages. In country like India the education system should not be fixed as same national curriculum as people in different region has different style of understanding. It may be related to different language or different education system. But same natiional curriculum for students until they enter collefge is not possible.
Secondly, let's consider the example of famous scientists Thomas Edison who was suffered from many difficulties to understand typical education system. He eas considered as special child thus school system has forced him to leave the school at very early age. His mother take the complete responsibility of his education and taught him subjects according to his interests. She did nopt follow national curriculum but she taught him according to his interests. And now rest of all the world known for his inventioins such as electric bulb, gramaphone etc.
Additionally, consider the mordern student case in which national curriculum is fixed to have history and geography in its syllabus. However, the student is interested in arts and drawing, also he was very talented in this particular field. And fixed national curriculum does not allow to study arts as subject for him. Thus, its like murder of inner child present inside that student which possess inner quality like zeal, courage etc.
However, if the national curriculum is not fixed and some elective subjects are there for every student then it will be considered as boonj for them. It will be proved as very profitable for development of that nation. Before going to college, the school national curriculum should be designed in such a way that it will beneficial for all the students and leads to over all development of students.
In the conclusion, many relevant examples were provided to prove that educattion system should be flexible and should be benificial to student in pragmatic way. The national curriculum was designed according to studen's choice not its vice-versa. Hence, on the basis of above mentioned examples the validity of my point of view is proved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...mmendation made in this issue. A nation should should focus on the needs of every indiviual s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 287, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'studying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: studying
...ixed national curriculum does not allow to study arts as subject for him. Thus, its like...
^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red as boonj for them. It will be proved as very profitable for development of th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1797235023 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74512168206 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7528546717 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7391304348 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300182420744 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963699942994 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092868614883 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167455483001 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740930726775 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.