A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f

Essay topics:

A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer homecooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion

The focus of the passage is bsed on sales study on consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City increased by 30 percent during five years. And in conclusion of passage author described that a new restaurent named Captain Seafood restaurent should be quite popular and profitable on basis of above mentioned studies. There are many flaws in assumption made by the author. Strong relevant suggestions will be provided to improve the flaws in the passage.

Firstly, let's take example of study results about consumption of Seafood dishes in Baycity restaurents. It states that consumption of sea food increases about 30 percent in five years. But the author has not described about the fact that there are many several reasons for the increased consumption of sea food. It may be possible that the taste of food in this restaurent without any speciality serves very delicious seafood. To improve this flaw the proper highlights on the other fact about diversity of food should be given.

Additionally, author suggest that major families of Bay city area are two income families who prefer to eat fewer homecooked food than others according to nationwide study. The flaw in the arguemet is that author did not described about the number of family members who eat fewer homecooked food. It may be possible that more family members eat homecooked food than others.

On the other hand, as the Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable. This assumption can be stated as true because the seafood is suuudenly in higher demand in last five years and there is no restaurent which are specialized in seafood. However, the Captain Seafood should serve dishes better than any other restaurent in Bay City area to be popular and profitable.

In short, the author has assumed false assumption in order to provide a conclusion. Valid examples provided in order to weaken the arguement given by author. Hence, it completely depends on services of Captain Seafood to improve the quality of restaurent and to attract more and more customers towards it.

Votes
Average: 2.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'describe'
Suggestion: describe
... in the arguemet is that author did not described about the number of family members who ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, may, so, in conclusion, in short, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 344.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08430232558 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65370995294 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459302325581 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1364623668 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295085651511 0.218282227539 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102467317181 0.0743258471296 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120961042802 0.0701772020484 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16874509732 0.128457276422 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106635340243 0.0628817314937 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

wrong arguments.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1710 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.971 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.599 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.675 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.594 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5