The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate is substantially lower than placement rates of many top-ranked schools. classen students would be more attractive to employers if they had more time to take advanced courses in their specialty, rather than being required to spend fifteen percent of their time at classen taking courses outside of their subject area. we demand, therefore, that the university abandon or drastically cut back on its breadth requirements.
Petition mentions a problem about current job placements in Classen University. It tries to convince directors to reschedule course rates on specialty and debates current breadth requirements. Students directly connect this result to course schedule policy. In fact, directors should take into account other possible explanations for this feedback before taking any action.
Firstly, this low rates of job placement may root from weak employment strategies of students. That is, they may be in a less competitive manner compared to previous people, hence this may not be only about course types, there is a high prospect that students may not be enough prepared or experienced for work life. In this case, it is advised to increase internship requirement rather than departmental courses or it is even better to increase unrestricted selective courses in order to get equipped for competitive corporate life tricks.
Secondly, they may not regard current employment rates in their region. This low rates may be related to a regional problem rather than merely college problem. To illustrate, there may be financial crisis and firms have started to stop new employments or even decrease their employers. Hence, to compare post placements of university, they should reckon on previous general economical conditions.
Furthermore, another possible explanation for this result is that students of Classen universities may have become less concentrated for their professional life or less in need for finding a job compared to previous students. So quality of students may have changed, as a result, we may have two types of student profile. While analyzing this subject, they should report their student profile academically.
To sum up, a clean comparison requires to consider possible slight differences between situations. After reviewing, if they still have the same idea, then they should reschedule their so-called burdensome breadth requirements without hesitation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments in Classen University. It tries to convince directors to reschedule course ...
^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... they should reckon on previous general economical conditions. Furthermore, another pos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort their student profile academically. To sum up, a clean comparison requires t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: considering
... To sum up, a clean comparison requires to consider possible slight differences between si...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to consider possible slight differences between situations. After reviewing, if ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 300.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60333333333 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94179650327 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.468620217663 125% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4374255065 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.70786347227 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21077129062 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702284032709 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472669564429 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114755536798 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056904219572 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32208582834 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.