The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
This statement assert that there is a high correlation between retention rates and free tuition policy. Faculty committee suggest that Oceania University also keep same policies with nearby colleges, which offer free tuition for their own children. There are not enough clear information to justify this offer, therefore, before takin any action, university directors should elaborate these.
First of all, one urgent clarification is differences in salaries which are directly related to retentions. These rates may be results of high professor salaries which is high incentive as expected. Most universities have alternated policies across funding professor due to their bugdets. This missing point may be the reason behind this instead of free tuition policy.
Secondly, another possible explanation is student profiles of universities. A students profile which holds qualifications such as curiosity, excitement and hardworking is always an ideal for an academic. They become more willing to teach and as they see progress they want to stay more to see and improve them further.
Besides, last notion worth to mention is that working conditions in Oceania may be not best condition for a professor. An independent and
enthusiastic academic environment always feed literature and high research funds provide more resources, leads to open doors and make capable of trying and discovering more accordingly. Following this, Seatown may have more conservative or may have small capacity for funding researches compared to Ocenia and retentions are lower instead.
Lastly, I recommend that director should conduct an evaluation about working conditions and student profiles of both universities. In addition to these, a full comparison including salaries should be executed for a warranted result. This is a need for funding policy, if numbers point out that problem is rooted from low salary in Seatown, allocating fund for free tuitions may make situations worse.
To sum up, there are some overlooked issues in the text, hence, this narrow observation is not enough to take free tuition policy as an one and only solution, this can create unexpected extra problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
This statement assert that there is a high correlation betwee...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion for a professor. An independent and enthusiastic academic environment always...
^^^^
Line 8, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources, leads to open doors and make capable of trying and discovering more a...
^^
Line 8, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vering more accordingly. Following this, Seatown may have more conservative or ma...
^^
Line 12, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t enough to take free tuition policy as an one and only solution, this can create ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, first, hence, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 334.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53892215569 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85228004449 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619760479042 0.468620217663 132% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9723082492 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.823529412 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.70786347227 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178782083402 0.218282227539 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561351602596 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644114889979 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830839146628 0.128457276422 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721021730138 0.0628817314937 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 98.500998004 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.