A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership with Sherwood Animal Shelter to institute an adopt-a-dog program. The program would encourage dog ownership for patients recovering from heart disease, which should reduce these patients' chance of experiencing continuing heart problems and also reduce their need for ongoing treatment. As a further benefit, the publicity about the program would encourage more people to adopt pets from the shelter. And that will reduce the incidence of heart disease in the general population.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In above statemant, it is stated that keeping pet will reduce the incidence of heart disease in the general population. The author prematurely concluded this wtih the evidences of
a recent study that reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Also it futher mention that Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership
with Sherwood Animal Shelter to institute an adopt-a-dog program. The program would encourage dog ownership for patients recovering from heart disease, which should reduce these patients'
chance of experiencing continuing heart problems and also reduce their need for ongoing treatment. In my opinion, I am opposite to the author side and argue because of the following two question:
Only rearing the dogs decrease the heart disease? I think playng wth dog make patent doing little exercise. That make people healthy rather than only rearing it up. Any person having dog
deffinately make him/her playing with it. This make intiation of small number of excercises. That what might decease the heart disease patent coundt down.
Is that recent study is favourable for all kind of patents? The author has not mention the way of study as well as among the number of people to whome the research was done. Perhaps the study might
be unfavourable for all kind of patents. Futher there might aries various kind of complication with rearing of dog. Various communicable diseases due to dogs make heart patent condition more worst.
In conclusion, the argument as it stand now is seems fallacious as it reliance on several unwarrented assumptions. If the auther is capable of answering two questions above and provide more
evidenes with scienticfic reaseach and study then it is possibile to analyse the implementatiton of auther conclusion
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 11 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 23 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1483 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.061 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.641 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.65 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.521 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.279 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 755, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e because of the following two question: Can adopt a dog program decrease the hea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he heart disease’s patients count down. Is the recent study favourable for all k...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he implementation of author’s conclusion
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.6327345309 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 298.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23489932886 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75767067176 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3532784499 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.70786347227 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29155628652 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852800206829 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104098504007 0.0701772020484 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151437623511 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13464759519 0.0628817314937 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.