Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help evaluate the recommendation.
Although the above suggestion for promoting the survival of the porpoise by offering boat tours delivered by the Bolarvian fishermen seems like it could be a potential solution to the overhunting issue, there are a few questions that come to mind before this plan should be implemented. In this essay I will outline the three questions pertaining to fishermen communication skills, interest in delivery, and the market for such services that could affect the success of such a program.
The first question to consider with this solution is what the market is for these boat tours. They would need to question tourists to see if this is something they would invest in while on a trip or would pass up. If there is a lot of interest in these tours than we could possibly implement this solution but if there is not much interest from the start we may need other ways to incentivize tourists to take such a boat trip.
Another question we must ask is how interested the fishermen are in offering such services. If after a interest survey we find there are not enough interested fisherman to adequately man a program of this sort, we would have to consider other solutions such as shorter tours or increased hours. If there is an abundance of interest in this program than they could easily offer longer rides and increased services and result in higher incomes.
Finally, we would need to assess the communication skills of the fishermen offering the tours. Since these individuals do not necessarily have to interact with as many individuals on a daily basis than other careers than perhaps they would need to do a communication training program to ensure positive consumer ratings. However, these fisherman may have great communication skills considering they spend so much time at sea and have so much experience with the species that it may not be a cause for concern.
As you can see, the is a need for further research before we attempt to implement such a solution. There are many questions we could address with this plan, but we would certainly need to address questions in costumer interest, fishermen interest, and communication skills before we go further with this plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... lot of interest in these tours than we could possibly implement this solution but if there is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...are in offering such services. If after a interest survey we find there are not e...
^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fisherman' or 'these fishermen'?
Suggestion: this fisherman; these fishermen
...ure positive consumer ratings. However, these fisherman may have great communication skills con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.9520958084 193% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 372.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89516129032 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71439228608 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454301075269 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8650656207 57.8364921388 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.076923077 119.503703932 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6153846154 23.324526521 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.70786347227 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175176204401 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765279295752 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413206614165 0.0701772020484 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108795204629 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276005165752 0.0628817314937 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.