.
Musicians express their thought and feelings through their compositions.Most of a musicians work is at its atmost popularity during his generation, as the generation proceeds to change the audience taste of music changes and would make the style of the musician's composition desicctaed.
The generation of audience, to which the musician's composition is targeted plays a vital role in how the piece of work is being assessed. For example if we take classic metal, it was more popular during the 1970's than it is now. The generation of audience keeps changing from decade to decade, music which motivated the audience in one generation might be just noise for the upcomming once. Although, it is still evident that people who belonged to the musician's generation hold his work dear to them, for them that is pure talent.
Musicians also compose their song giving importance to a particular context in mind. For example, if a musician had based his work on romance and love, for the generation which is after his death, might consider that as illogical and may be at some point nonsense. Musicians most of the time use moon and stars to depict the roamnce that happens between a couple in love, comparing the girls face to a full moon for instance. For the current generation, knowing that the moon is filled with craters might take this the other way which simply demeans the one being complemented with the song. This doesn't mean that the musicians composition was nonsense for the people of his regime.
It is clear that, assessing the musicians work after his death in a different generation that too will not provide fair circumstances to evaluate the musician's talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Most
...and feelings through their compositions.Most of a musicians work is at its atmost po...
^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...changes and would make the style of the musicians composition desicctaed. The generati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...he generation of audience, to which the musicians composition is targeted plays a vital r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...evident that people who belonged to the musicians generation hold his work dear to them, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... being complemented with the song. This doesnt mean that the musicians composition was...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...ith the song. This doesnt mean that the musicians composition was nonsense for the people...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...vide fair circumstances to evaluate the musicians talent.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96453900709 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70819853758 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8428997291 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.272727273 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.