.
In the argument the comparison between two sanctuaries are taken into consideration, one in Eastern Carpentaria and other in West Lansburg. This comparison might not hold good always, due to the change in geographial locations.
The argumet has made two assumptions, one of which is repealing a sanctuary is reason for the decline in sea otter population in the sanctuary in Eastern carpentaria, if same is followed for the sanctuary in West Lansburg decline in the popluation of tufted groundhog is iminent. It can be noticed that the habitats for the animals is different in both the places, the food availabilty, existance of predators, shelter, many other reasons would have a role to play in the decline of the population of sea otters, it is not necessarily due to the human intervention. This might not be the case for the sanctuary in West Lansburg, the habitat in this area might be the most conducive to the groundhogs and human intervention might not affect the existing conditons.
Also, two different years are taken for the comparison. It is not likely that the conditions in 2004 is same as it was in 1978, which saw the decline in population of sea otters. In 1978, repealing the sactuary status might have invited more poachers and hunters which led to the decline of sea otters. Allowing the construction of an access road is not same as repealing the sanctuary status. Although, chances are there that the moving vehicles on the access road lead to killing the groundhogs, which results in decline of population, if this taken for deliberation then access road will be a bad idea.
Building an access road is not the only aspect which hinders the attempt of conserving the biodiversity others attributes should also be taken into consideration.
It is clear that, assessing the musicians work after his death in a different generation that too will not provide fair circumstances to evaluate the musician's talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...vide fair circumstances to evaluate the musicians talent.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99691358025 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93147329261 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484567901235 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7114588859 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.916666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.91666666667 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.