105. Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which

Essay topics:

105. Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Imagination and experience are the fundamental sources of development of civilization. By the imagination, for example, the past people thought what would feel if they could fly. And this imagination was realized by the accumulated experience that helped create an airplane. Even though both imagination and experience are crucial to human life, I disagree with the statement that imagination is a more valuable than experience and the reason suggested above.
Granted, by the assistance of imagination, people can think about what is impossible and unrealistic. This kind of thinking fulfills the people’s desire to explore the unknown. For instance, people have curiosity unquenchable by the experience since it could not take place or observe in reality. The common curiosity among all the people is the questions like “does the god exist?” or “what would happen if we die?”. These kind of questions are highly intriguing, but could not be answered by the experience. Rather, people could imagine about the artificial reality in their own mind to explore answers to those questions. Even though the questions listed could not be perfectly explored by the imagination, it is only imagination which enables people to alleviate the curiosity inside them. However, unlike the reason stated above, in most cases, the imagination is shackled by the former habits or presuppositions. This is because, at least to some extent, the imagination is based on the experiences. Take an example of harry porter, which is quite imaginative novel. The novel deals with the world where the magic exists. However, the user of the magic is human. It is highly likely that if such a world exists, magicians could be other than human existence. Like this, imagination is affected by the established way of thinking based on experiences.

Moreover, in consideration of the impact on real life, the imagination pales in comparison with the experience. This is because most of the invents and products are made from an abundance of trial and error, which is exactly the experience. For instance, the Thomas Edison made a lightbulb with countless experiments. Without the experience he couldn’t made the such an affordable and beneficial product that changed the aspect of people’s real life.

In conclusion, the experience is much more beneficial than experience because it leads to betterment of the people’s life and effects the contents of imagination. Therefore, we should experience more to make out life more better and imagine much more.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...pos;what would happen if we die?'. These kind of questions are highly intriguing, but...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 223, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...should experience more to make out life more better and imagine much more.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38213399504 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10045432537 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501240694789 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0709598132 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7916666667 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277671175869 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077669678747 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532323974288 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175182938381 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473348228405 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.