1. The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author claims that the efficient methods of teaching in any realm is by applauding the positive actions and ignoring the negative ones. This is the claim with which I partially do concur. While praising the decent action is a wise idea, the overlooking of errors in an indecent way of teaching. Among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking reason which should be bolded is the impact of acclaiming of action over its repetition. In fact, mankind by the encouragement is more stimulated to do a good job. This invocation is motivation raises up while it accompanies with the verification of the previously done action. As an individual informs his activity is verified by others; in addition, it is applauded in the public, he gets more eager to repeat the identical action. Even the combination of this eagerness with chasm willing of flourishment is the human being encourages him to go beyond his previous attempt and do more magnificent action and appeal to others. Therefore, as the educator, employer, or parents encourage the positive action of their student, employees, or kids, their attempt for doing more better action has risen.
Another equal crux reason which should be highlighted here is the privileging of the decent actions applauded by the head among the other people. Indeed, by the encouragement of the decent action by head person leads the shedding spotlights over that action; consequently, other people get informed about its greatness and try to do the same action. This fact is averred by the recent survey conducted in by Psychology Department of Tehran University. According to this noteworthy intelligence survey, the action of appraising a great action of the kids in the kindergartens of Tehran causes to the duplication of the identical action by other kids to get the same encouragement from the teacher.
However, what is mentioned in the two previous paragraphs, did not make the sentence to be valid entirely, in another word, the ignorance of the bad action is not a decent method of pedagogy. Actually, there should be an explicit norm which lucidly defines and separates the bads from goods, the action of underestimating the bad action causes to the preparation of skeptic picture over this norm. As long as the students, employees, or children do not aware of their mistakes, the chance of redoing the exact mistake unconsciously is high; besides, the repetition of the same indecent habits over time leads to it gets the appearance of common behavior among them. Thus, the action of training will face failure by the erroring done because of the trainer’s ignorance.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lucidly illustrate that the claim is right by acclaiming the good action; on the other hand, the overlooking the error is not a wise way of teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an indecent way" with adverb for "indecent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a wise idea, the overlooking of errors in an indecent way of teaching. Among the countless rearin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...oyees, or kids, their attempt for doing more better action has risen. Another equal crux r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he same encouragement from the teacher. However, what is mentioned in the two pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he error is not a wise way of teaching.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0572597137 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93255384116 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498977505112 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8807099061 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.157894737 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195443515857 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674432660506 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528355741281 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119988948447 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737485237582 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.