In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for society to regard any living man or women as a hero
Author’s claim “In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for society to regard any living man or women as a hero”, in my opinion holds credence as due to easy accessibility and availability of information and also media to make their profits pry on the personal lives of heroes and some part of behavior of heroes might result in people discordance with code of conduct. Thus, I would like to support author’s claim and following are the reasons for my accordance.
Firstly, Consider an example of Legend Lance Armstrong, he has influence many people through his achievements and through his perseverance in battling with the severe disease but after the disclose of Armstrong consuming drugs had made people to consider Armstrong no longer a hero. It is not wrong as when people learn the bad habits or bad part of the behavior of their heroes they might not able to give respect to them. There is a code of conduct set by people in their minds about their heroes and if heroes fails to abide with it, that can bring disregard from people. Thus, above example aptly justify the claim made by author.
Secondly, Heroes are the person whose actions, behavior is considered to be ideal for a society so sometimes those heroes to maintain their position need to façade their real emotions so that they actions doesn’t backfire them or ruin their image. Consider an example of Bollywood in India, many actors and actress have to covert their social life, love life, etc. and only take actions which cultivate strong image in front of the society. Due to media, those actors and actress need to ruminate over while making any decisions in their life so that they image might not discord with the code of conduct set by society. But still there are many truths that media fabricate it up to earn the profits. Thus, media plays very important role in maintaining the image of heroes in front of society.
However, There are many heroes those have proved their worth for example, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Sachin Tendulkar, etc. Such heroes have played transparent and were able to inspire thousands of millions of people and still today people consider them as their heroes. Thus, it is not impossible for society to regard any living man or women as a hero but sometimes society should ignore negative points about their heroes as no person is perfect, each and every human behavior have some flaws. If society search for a person with no flaws then it would be impossible to regard any person as hero by examining his/her actions.
On wrapping up, In the age of intensive media, it is likely that people face difficulty while considering any living man and women as their hero but it is not impossible if one people are flexible enough to judge one’s situation and ignore some flaws in their code of conduct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tling with the severe disease but after the disclose of Armstrong consuming drugs had made p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re some flaws in their code of conduct.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82555780933 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4701302213 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468559837728 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.3454222124 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.941176471 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343116268357 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103407112328 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127800431871 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214732456745 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129141350646 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.