All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Every company wants to work as efficiently as they could, so that they can make more profit from their work which they do.
Keeping this in mind some companies hire outside consultancies to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. They spend money on these outside consultants so that these outside consultants can help them work more efficiently and in turn make more money. The companies should spend more time listening to their employees which can give them effective solution to any problem company is facing.
Companies spend lots of money on consultants to work efficiently because these consultants are just money making firms which will never help as efficiently as your own employers. companies should not spend that extra money on consultancies to work efficiently but listen to their employers who know about companies working and ethics and would able to help more efficiently. there is no one other than employers who knows more about company and are so the best deal to listen to for the operation of company more efficiently.
consultancies work on money and are money minded business men who would never want their clients to be satisfied easily and would never want their clients problems to be finished at once. They will always look for their profit which will lead to the delay is problem solving process. But company employers will always give the best and effective solution for the problem because they will always want their company to work as efficiently as it could .
Companies should held a board meeting once a week to get the important suggestions from their employers for the smooth working of their company and should keep the reward for the best solution to any problem company is facing. these rewards will always motivates employers to give their best to help the company work efficiently which will lead to the saving to money and time which is spent on outside consultant.
Company employers are the best asset it could have which should be used with full potential for the working of the company. So I would say that companies should not hire consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. They should listen to their own employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...p as efficiently as your own employers. companies should not spend that extra money on co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...nd would able to help more efficiently. there is no one other than employers who know...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consultancies
...eration of company more efficiently. consultancies work on money and are money minded busi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 450, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mpany to work as efficiently as it could . Companies should held a board meetin...
^^
Line 8, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ution to any problem company is facing. these rewards will always motivates employers...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 254, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
...ny is facing. these rewards will always motivates employers to give their best to help th...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'look', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224226804124 0.238963963785 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.175257731959 0.154291517835 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0567010309278 0.0886310499679 64% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0876288659794 0.0506014161523 173% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0618556701031 0.0449626384858 138% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0979381443299 0.123526278965 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0309278350515 0.0379742944744 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55024475686 2.82910677849 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0618556701031 0.0316879551592 195% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0747422680412 0.0950106342287 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0618556701031 0.0245489744465 252% => Try to use less modal verbs (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0257731958763 0.0157978311181 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2227.0 2899.98275862 77% => OK
No of words: 373.0 478.390804598 78% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97050938338 6.0591788892 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.65681771538 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308310991957 0.369966551584 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241286863271 0.285172536893 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142091152815 0.207245337619 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120643431635 0.136322040163 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55024475686 2.82910677849 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 234.298850575 58% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.361930294906 0.492565540709 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 37.3852336424 56.8184620615 66% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 21.1264367816 71% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8666666667 23.7468607788 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9148671358 62.0618507366 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.466666667 143.81877709 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 23.7468607788 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 0.728815259664 27% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.71264367816 78% => OK
Readability: 48.9953529937 52.2641144681 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.0873015873 1.64547068916 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507774135741 0.39480681544 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.185286097758 0.11556216369 160% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0924917720743 0.0736162880345 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66002761484 0.531340600358 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133165069903 0.15197228837 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254893809906 0.158818324754 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128719931238 0.0851127212816 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433237868681 0.388921930462 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0930127996975 0.0677916285025 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338839829463 0.28015025965 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13075883545 0.0610219844235 214% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.8591954023 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30459770115 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.96264367816 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.10632183908 160% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.93390804598 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.04597701149 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 15.0862068966 86% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.0 Out of 6