All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
In any business, efficiency is key. Efficiency increases productivity which increases profit. However, some companies fall behind in this area and feel the need to hire an outside consultant to take a better look at what is going wrong in the company. But, often times, the primary problem is a lack of communication in the work place particularly between the employer and the employees. Although a consultant would provide a beneficial outsider`s view of the company, hiring one would also cost a fair bit of money and would often be unnecessary if communication was better within the workplace.
One of the main aspects of being an adult is having a career. This, of course, comes with an employer. An employer has the responsibility to have a professional relationship with his or her employees. However, this relationship can occasionally get too professional to the point that there is an invisible wall between the employer and their subsidiaries. In a company, employees should feel comfortable bringing work place concerns to their employer. One may argue that this wastes the boss`s valuable time. If reality, however, once relationships are improved and lines of communication are open, concerns will be far and few between leaving the employer to do his job as he normally would but in a better environments. So, in actuality, better communication and an improved relationship would help the entire company-not just the employees.
When employees feel comfortable in the workplace, they are likely to get more work done. As an example, say an employee at a statistics company has an issue with understanding the topic she is to analyze. If she has a poor relationship with the employer, she may be too afraid to ask and end up spending countless nights trying to figure out her topic and writing a substandard report. However, if the employee is comfortable coming to her boss with her concerns she may schedule a meeting to clarify her knowledge on what she is analyzing. This principle goes for any business, whether it be a pet sitter or an internationally traveling accounting consultant. If the employees are happy then more work gets done and there are less problems to worry about. In the end, the company that reinforces positive communication will save scores of money on a consultant and gain even more in profit due to increased productivity.
Finally, when a business foregoes hiring a consultant for improving communication, they will save a large sum of money. Presumably a consultant is expensive. Once a company gets to the point of needing one, their productivity and profits are more than likely down a fair bit and hiring a consultant would take even more of the much needed money. This may go so far as to require a lessening of paychecks and or some pink slips within the business. It can be said, however, that an outsider`s objective opinion may help a failing company. While this may be true in some cases, for the most part in a business the only people who truly know what is going on are those who are there for forty hours a week. Additionally, if the boss knows a consultant is coming, he or she may tell their subsidiaries specific topics to not tell the consultant about to avoid making the company look worse.
To recapitulate, while a consultant may be useful in some cases, most of the time a business would benefit more if the employees felt they had a better relationship with their employer. After all, the employees and the employer are the same thing-people. And people benefit from relationships with other people. The workplace should be no different.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 728, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... then more work gets done and there are less problems to worry about. In the end, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, then, while, after all, as to, of course, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3022.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96223316913 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07714240133 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449917898194 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 952.2 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7447236236 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4838709677 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6451612903 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32258064516 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263747413124 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649188033692 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607073139176 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158516683242 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541575091737 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.