All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
It is argued that for the effective function and increased potentiality of an organization, hiring external consultants is a necessary prerequisite. While true to some extent, this suggestion should not be of prime concern; rather it should be secondary and could be undertaken right after the needs of the internal employees are taken care of. Employees are the most crucial part of the organization and once their needs are fulfilled, a company is more likely to be successful since content workforce will directly and willingly participate in increasing the profitability of that company.
Businesses in today's world are being confronted with rapidly changing environment, heightened competition, new challenges and critically imposed policies and regulations on them. In these circumstances, it has become understandably difficult to sustain as a profitable organization. Amidst of these emerged difficulties, it can be said with considerable logic and reason that the company that focuses more importance on keeping its own employees satisfied will have a much higher chance of existing as a viable company. The employees of a business institution, also known as its internal customers are those who are directly involved in performing the major tasks: workers manufacturing the products, engineers monitoring the processes and executives supervising the system. In this scenario, if the management takes initiatives and prioritize their needs above all, this workforce will get motivated and assured of the support they have from their company. As a result, they will be working wholeheartedly as well as be responsible and sincere. This will not only result in an increased profit of the firm but also will aid in sustaining the extant employees of the firm.
It is true that external consultants will be beneficial to the company. However, if the company, neglecting the needs of its employees get dependent on these consultants thinking they will be sufficient to achieve the company's vision, they are blatantly wrong. The consultants may be beneficial a firm but the firm in business has to look after its employee first rather than keeping them discontent and hire external consultants.
Every company must realize the fact that it the internal workforce of the company that is doing its work to make the company's vision come true; to achieve its goal it is looking forward to. These employees who are abreast of everything that is going on with the company should be given the utmost priority. Ignoring them and depending on outside consultants will in no way facilitate the accomplishment of the company's target.
In a nutshell, a business institution can be well-off by focusing on the demands of its employees. In addition, to boost up their performance, the hired consultants can act as sidekicks. Thus, it can be stated that to gain efficacy these hired people will be more like an optional measure; treating the employees with proper and deserved attention should be the foremost important step taken by a particular association.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33884297521 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10075441774 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506198347107 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.96405048 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4736842105 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242490773285 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082231197998 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538714734754 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159152132518 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524159284877 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.