Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers
their peers while maintaining respect. However, while this is an important trait, this doesn't make it solely more important than the ability to use sound judgment.
When commanding a group of peers, it's advantageous to refer to one's own moral judgment. While the opinions and morality of those peers can falter and be replaced depending on a particular set of people, a leader having a firm sense of their own morality can bolster their confidence in the decisions that they make. Regardless of the feelings of those being led, the reasoning behind decisions will be based on the leader's own moral compass.
The confidence in decision-making that accompanies sound moral judgment may also be sensed by those being led, leading to a gain in their respect. The motives persuading someone whose morality bends with the majority surrounding them may be considered untrustworthy, as their actions are based not on their own beliefs, but of others who they hope to lead. If seen this way by their peers, the very trait they hoped would gain respect might lead to a feeling of distrust instead.
This is not to say that the respect of a leader's peers is unnecessary, but that it holds a similar place in importance to a sound moral judgment. Even with an incredibly steadfast morality, a complete lack of respect from peers would likely render a potential leader incapable of commanding the necessary presence. To best carry out the role of leadership, both holding sound moral judgment and maintaining the respect of peers should be traits that are personified.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
their peers while maintaining respect. Howeve...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... while this is an important trait, this doesnt make it solely more important than the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01915708812 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76842659051 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8302904993 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304736230567 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134456730675 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928679735449 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213331089789 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121387167645 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.