Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
I mostly disagree with the passage that sound moral judgment is a prominent characteristic of an effective leader but it is not important as leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers because of the two main reasons. However, in some cases it can be disadvantageous.
Firstly, to begin with the leaders's ability to keep up the respect off his subordinates does not qualify as an important characteristic. As it is rightly said that respect cannot be borrowed it has to created. For instance if the such was the case that respected could be maintained by other's then many unrespected and reprobate celebrities, businessman, politicians could easily buy respected and be at the top of the people's head. Thus,the ability of mantaing respect of his peers should not be considered as a criteria for defining a leader.
Further, the much more important factor which is of making sound moral judgment should be considered as the important aspect of a leader. For example, if a leader is not able to make better decisions for his subordinates then by doing any kind of branding for his peers won't be able to maintain his or his peer's respect. Another example would be of the ex-indian captain M.S Dhoni who earned the respect by his performance and the leadership qualities such as good analytical thinking, decision making and strategies. Thus, the judgmental skills should be provided much more importance than maintaing respect of his peers.
However, in some cases the leader's doh ire the PR team in order to maintain the status and respect of his or her peers as it is directly related to their own stature in the society. but, the truth always gets revealed and the fallacious things come to an end. This, I would conclude by disagreeing with the prompt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I mostly disagree with the passage that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e cases it can be disadvantageous. Firstly, to begin with the leaderss abil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...qualify as an important characteristic. As it is rightly said that respect cannot...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alify as an important characteristic. As it is rightly said that respect cannot b...
^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... be at the top of the peoples head. Thus,the ability of mantaing respect of his peer...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criterion' or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: a criterion; criteria
...f his peers should not be considered as a criteria for defining a leader. Fu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a criteria for defining a leader. Further, the much more important factor ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ple would be of the ex-indian captain M.S Dhoni who earned the respect by his per...
^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an maintaing respect of his peers. However, in some cases the leaders doh ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct of his peers. However, in some cases the leaders doh ire the PR...
^^
Line 13, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... However, in some cases the leaders doh ire the PR team in order to maintai...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ed to their own stature in the society. but, the truth always gets revealed and the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, thus, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90099009901 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85306611838 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7763384354 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.21951772744 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418916044927 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147635879536 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147221522783 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28318064162 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127425123906 0.0667264976115 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.