We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
I mostly disagree with the prompt that one can learn much more with the people who share our views as compared to those whose views are different from us because of the two main reasons. However it is possible to learn with the people with similar view points too, but there will be overlapping of knowledge.
Firstly to begin with, sharing our views with the people with opposite ideas helps an individual to expand his or her range of perspective enabling an individual to get better idea of a topic. For instance, if there are two people who share opposing ideas are made to debate on them, there would be much greater room for learning about the topic and understanding why does the opponent has come to the conclusion and why does he believes in his views. Thus it widens perspective for determining ones view points.
Further, it also helps an individual in long-term to master the field and for gaining confidence in his views in that filed. For example, if a person is tackling same questions with multiple number of persons he would in turn understand their view in better way and would also come up with better justifications which would help then to understand his views. Also every person's perspective is also different so it will also help him to learn different views too.
However, in case of the people who share similar views may have something to share within themselves but the possibility of overlapping of the same information is higher. What it means is that the people with same views may share some information which provides better learning opportunity but in most of the case there will be higher chance that the shared information is more common and already known to an individual as compared to the new information. Thus, I would like to close by stating that there is comparatively not much more learning with people of same ideology as compared to the people with opposite ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I mostly disagree with the prompt that o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rom us because of the two main reasons. However it is possible to learn with the people...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere will be overlapping of knowledge. Firstly to begin with, sharing our view...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edge. Firstly to begin with, sharing our views with the people with o...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'?
Suggestion: have
...and understanding why does the opponent has come to the conclusion and why does he ...
^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe'?
Suggestion: believe
... come to the conclusion and why does he believes in his views. Thus it widens perspectiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: believe
... come to the conclusion and why does he believes in his views. Thus it widens perspectiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and why does he believes in his views. Thus it widens perspective for determining o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive for determining ones view points. Further, it also helps an individual in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ould help then to understand his views. Also every persons perspective is also diffe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...hen to understand his views. Also every persons perspective is also different so it wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp him to learn different views too. However, in case of the people who share...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to the people with opposite ideas.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78012048193 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58426538221 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478915662651 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0585241936 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.272727273 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1818181818 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278416524525 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125165243699 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938051987462 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192945281515 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106378036678 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.