In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Delegating positions of power should be done in case of real necessity or case of a good alternative. No doubt, that changing of power in any field is an event of special importance, furthermore, such moments can cause anxiety among the surrounding people of lower rank. Eventually, the consequences of these steps should be considered from different points of view very diligently.
Changes are necessary for any progress and movement, but what if there is no suitable candidate at the moment? Is worse, but a new ruler will be better than an old and reliable one? For example, not so far we had an election in the research institute where I currently work. Three candidates were presented and I can confidently say the result of the voting was more than predictable: the old director was elected for the third time. Probably, other potential heads would be not so bad, but only the winner had shown the real acknowledge of the state of affairs in the institute, discuss the existing problems and possible ways of their solving. On the base of this real situation, it can be concluded that changes in power should be done in case of real confidence in the future head. In another way, the consequence of power delegating can be disgusting.
But of course, if there is a dramatic situation lasting for several years which shows no positive possibilities, the power stepping down can be invigorating and refreshing act indeed. As it was mentioned before, the possible candidates should be considered and discussed from different sides of view.
The problem of authorities delegating is a complex and ambivalent step for people which often involves disagreements, anxiety and even scandals. Summing up the above, I conclude that power should be changed if it is only necessary, in any other way the results of hasty solutions can be crucial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, third, for example, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96451612903 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89231102396 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2814714078 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189878903959 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708211061395 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368899924833 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137655030795 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324302727205 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.