Home >> .

Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which

Essay topics: Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

natashasuzu's picture

Do the achievements of the eminent people represent the great nation? Probably, in general it is telling factor, but to say the truth, the welfare of all its people is more convincing indicator.

Achievements of the nation’s prominent people can be indicator of their willpower, hardworking and numerous personal advantages. Let’s remember Michail Lomonosov, outstanding Russian scientist and writer, who came to Moscow from small Archangelsk country by barefoot to study. At that time, he could not get higher education so he had to forge documents for entering Slavic Greek Latin Academy. How many people were in Russia that had talents but no opportunities because of their origin? Consequently, it can be stated that open and accessible education is one of the important points in welfare of great nation.

Polity always consists not only from “regular” people but also from power which is often represented by several branches. Obviously that the main aim of this puissant people is to found and create the conditions and possibilities to make nation flourish. It can be free education, as it was mentioned in previous paragraph, health care, high level of wages, material supplements for mothers, etc. The better social conditions are demanded if we want to do our best.

The USSR was a great place for scientists and furthermore the career of a scientist was elite and reverent. But time is changing and now all we can see is deserted institutes of Russian Academy of Sciences. Unsurprisingly that people prefer routine work to creative one because of stability. There are a lot of factors for a such disgusting situation but the absence of financial guarantees is one of the key reasons. And many of those people who wanted a scientific career left abroad for a better life.

To sum up the above, it is necessary to evaluate the welfare of the whole nation not only achievements of its outstanding persons. Probably, there are much more potential writers, compositors and other outstanding people around us than we can imagine but some external factors impede their prolific creativeness.

Essay Categories: 
Votes: 
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
3 weeks 5 days ago Roshan Dhakal 66 Read full essay
4 months 1 week ago bill1441 66 Read full essay
6 months 4 days ago yoonjung1917@gm... 75 Read full essay
9 months 3 weeks ago octa_08 50 Read full essay
10 months 1 week ago Gh.Ne 66 Read full essay
10 months 1 week ago Gh.Ne 79 Read full essay
11 months 4 weeks ago a734547007 66 Read full essay
2 years 4 months ago urvangP Read full essay
3 years 1 month ago flowerft2007 66 Read full essay
4 years 1 month ago EugeneDubinchuk 60 Read full essay

Pages

More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, in general, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20699708455 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0401495849 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586005830904 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5679285775 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142519430995 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465610688086 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604865043547 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881571812755 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548862724061 0.0667264976115 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages