A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The national curriculum should be quite uniform but include some specifications and preferable subjects depending on plans.
No doubt that everybody should have basic knowledge in every field of art and science, but I think that school students focusing on their primary interests is also important especially during the latest years of the school. If the school education program is absolutely the same for everyone it would make trouble for students in the future. For example, many natural sciences require good ground in such disciplines as mathematics and physics. Consequently, the limitations of advanced courses in school will result in studying them in college in addition to the other new courses. As for me, it looks like a waste of time.
Furthermore, the impending studying of specialties in school can result in students' unawareness of their real interests and possibilities. Most of the subjects look attractive and exciting at first glance, but during the more detailed investigation, some particular areas of science can be found difficult, uninteresting or even revolting. So the acceptance of the uniform national curriculum can limit the view on the real state of affairs in certain fields.
But sometimes preferable courses can take all the student attention and resources, that he or she will have huge gaps in other disciplines. Unfortunately, such a sad situation can be seen in Russia due to the current form of graduate attestation. A student is ought to choose some special subjects which he or she will take of. So most people forget about general courses or consider them negligible that do not deserve attention. Eventually, after a school person can have commendable knowledge in a few disciplines and at the same time, he or she can be an absolute ignoramus in the other areas. But several decades ago, in USSR, all the graduates should pass a certain set of exams including a variety of subjects independent of future student intentions.
I think, if someone wants to be considered as an intelligent person, he or she should have fundamentals in many of the disciplines. Consequently, if a nation wants to have potential and knowledgable young people it should be encouraging the uniform education but be plausible enough to allow students to develop in some preferable direction at the same time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, so, as for, for example, i think, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18205804749 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04477942865 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527704485488 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9491368748 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.529411765 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.70786347227 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121891303486 0.218282227539 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426674054832 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306413321282 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745105621622 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015178154214 0.0628817314937 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.