In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The issue that, in any field of inquiry, the beginner make telling contribution than the expert is a contentious one. I believe that expert make pivotal contributions than the novice. Because, the novice may has less experience and less practical knowledge than the seasoned one. And the veteran has more patience and abrupt decision making skills than the rookie.
Firstly, since the beginner has no or little experience in the particular field, he may has only the theoretical knowledge, not enough practical knowledge, when compared to the expert who is more experienced. So, in any field of inquiry, experience plays vital role in extracting important information than theoretical knowledge.
Secondly, instant decision making capabilities are required, to check the authenticity of the extracted information, in any inquiry. As, it requires confidence, which lacks in the novice, he cannot take decisions abruptly like the seasoned one, who has more confidence and judiciousness, which matters most.
Thirdly, to excerpt the important information , patience is also needed. One has to be a good listener to collect information. If one is very truculent, then he/she cannot make the people, who are getting investigated, to give the vital information. Since, the rookie may not have patience like veteran, he/she cannot make important contributions like the expert.
Some may argue that novice may has new skills and methods, which helps in extracting the vital information. But, the rookie also need the experience, not the novel skills only, to make telling contributions.
Hence, as the beginner may have less experience, less judicious, less abrupt decision making capabilities, and less patience than the expert, he/she is less likely than the expert to make important contributions in any field of inquiry.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. has been updated. 83
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, however, all of the five best-selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin. Furthermore, a recent 41
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 27
- A Nation Should Require All Of Its Students To Study The Same National Curriculum 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...kie. Firstly, since the beginner has no or little experience in the particular ...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ly, to excerpt the important information , patience is also needed. One has to be ...
^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...tributions like the expert. Some may argue that novice may has new skills and meth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49290780142 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01707609991 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485815602837 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4438401961 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45482692004 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150091988851 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12060699584 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226933574929 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114064785383 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.