In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
When we talk about a field of inquiry, the discipline that it includes can be multifarious - Geology, Zoology, Botany, Magnetic science and countless others; all embodied within the subject of science. It involves studying the nature of the world with the aim of quelling the thirst for knowledge that people have and, at the same time, coming up with inventions, each nudging the society towards its betterment. The given argument contends that these inventions are more likely to be brought up by beginners in the field, rather than the vaunted experts. My views are not in acquiesce with the author.
Beginner's luck - there is an expression given for feats that are achieved by the amateurs of the field. The feat may be significant, but luck is not a metric based on which we can just say that they are better than the veterans. Definitely, beginners are creative, they may approach problems in manners that an expert may not even imagine to pursue. But whatever techniques that experts use are often proven techniques, whilst the techniques used by a beginner are not always proven. Their urge for experimentation and naivete is all that which brings about the coincidental discoveries. But these coincidences are equally possible by experts, or just about anyone if they beat on the bush.
When scientific technology was just fledging, at that time there was a myriad of things that people didn't know. There was a wealth of discoveries that could easily be made, and thus many were done with simple luck too. A person would have simply rubbed two stones and voila, we have a fire. A chemist would have mistakenly spilled a chemical over another and voila, we have a new chemical. However, the time is different now. Any innovations come up as a culmination of many years of research. In order to invent something that has a big societal impact, it might even take decades of work, that too with many people working in the team day in day out.
Summing up, the callow beginners are not more likely to contribute to science like experts. The statement that the beginners are more likely to make contributions is only relevant many decades back when the world of science was itself a beginner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine pursuing'.
Suggestion: imagine pursuing
... in manners that an expert may not even imagine to pursue. But whatever techniques that experts u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...here was a myriad of things that people didnt know. There was a wealth of discoveries...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86170212766 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64050321258 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5827066084 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2105263158 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63157894737 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15959705412 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454335254113 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386244950317 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974009075636 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040093936333 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.