In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Every beginner possesses a great potential to be an expert in his or her chosen field. This statement implies that every beginner has a scope of improvement. Beginner requires assiduous and consistent effort to be an expert. Though beginners possess more passion and energy than the experts, this doesn’t signify that they can make more contribution than experts. It is true that a novice is more energetic and compassionate in beginning but to reach to an expert level they have to put their diligent and persistent effort.
Beginners are enthusiastic and they are fully dedicated to their work as they are in the starting phase of their life but they require certain years to expertize in their work. There are many people who started their business when they were young and not having much experience but they strive hard to make their business worth remarkable by their persistent and scintillating efforts. They stand out in the crowd but after some years of struggle. This doesn’t mean that just after entering in the field they got the success. Yes, there are some extraordinary talents who have proved their worth in small span such as Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg etc who proved their ability in the nascent stage.
In the scientifical field, the scientists require patience to do their experiments. A person new to this field has to study various minute details and also they require to expertize to get success. After some years of experience, they are capable of inventing something panegyric. Research of the particular field is very necessary for the scientific field. Similarly, in the field of teaching experienced and senior teachers contribute more to the field of education than the neophytes. After many years of experience, they develop contacts and gain more knowledge in a certain subject. That is the reason why the dean of the institution or the head of the department is the one who has experience of several years, not the one who has less experience. We can also consider the example of the biggest post of the country that is the seat of Prime Minister and President. This place is never given to a fresh person or who is new in the politics rather it is given to the person who has showcased their talent in many years of their work. It is not serendipity or piece of cake to handle the whole country, it definitely requires expertise and consistent efforts.
In conclusion, it is not correct to purport that beginners are more likely to contribute than the experts. There are only a few examples where beginners have stood out but it is fallacious to say that beginners are more likely to make an important contribution than experts. It is true that they are enthusiastic in beginning but they have to work with the same consistency for many years to get the required outcome. Thus, experts make more contribution in any field than the beginners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...al to be an expert in his or her chosen field. This statement implies that every begi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91446028513 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73923409376 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446028513238 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8157333495 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.541666667 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4583333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274648709795 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944998093339 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112590799688 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210058662222 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13871056594 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.